Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus >

dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus

Notices

dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-21-2006, 05:06 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus

any body try both or have study's on both need for blower eng.
eliminatethis is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 06:53 AM
  #2  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus

in this case is no reply good or bad for me in using dana i can't believe nobody has info or has used them
eliminatethis is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 09:40 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
GoCiggie31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Where the water meets the oaks 'n Pines in the Sierra Nevada's of NorCal
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus

imho, on a forced induction set up, with conservative boost I would guess that the difference in the two(if any) would be so minimal that it would not be recognized in a marine application- speed wise.

Bling factor and clearance would probably be the difference.

FYI, I have imco powerflows-12 months new.

Good luck
GoCiggie31 is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 09:52 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
JasonSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 4,333
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus

I can't say on the blown application. I have 2 sets on my 454efi's & they look, sound & perform better than any manifold I have ever tried. I have only had Gils, Revolutions & the Danas & out of the 3 Dana is the best. They just look good & perform good too. It also helps that they were the less expensive choice also.
Call Dana & see what they say. They promised me a gain & I got it. I actually got exactally what they said I would get.
JasonSmith is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 12:43 PM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus

thanks i also like the looks but had not heard any reports on them but you all helped out
eliminatethis is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 09:54 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Harwich, MA
Posts: 1,340
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default Re: dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus

I replaced a set of Lightning headers on my 502, look great and perform just as good, if not better than the Lightnings. I was running "almost" dry headers and did have to dump a little more than half of the water that was flowing thru the Dana Vortex risers to eliminate a little reversion at idle. I was looking for this problem from the start and saw signs right off, so I corrected the situation. It was quite easy, I just added an additional 90degree nipple on each manifold behind each riser and ran enough of a restrictor to adjust to just enough water flowing thru the risers.
Great package, great customer service from Dana Marine.
TomR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
288sunny
General Q & A
9
06-21-2007 07:56 PM
buffexec
General Q & A
9
03-24-2007 01:28 PM
HARDCORE A/O
General Q & A
22
03-14-2007 09:44 AM
glassdave
General Q & A
48
07-30-2006 01:24 AM
TomR
General Q & A
7
11-01-2005 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: dana flow torque vs. imco power flow plus


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.