Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Bravo VS Trs exhaust HELP >

Bravo VS Trs exhaust HELP

Notices

Bravo VS Trs exhaust HELP

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-01-2009, 10:50 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default Bravo VS Trs exhaust HELP

Hello,
I will soon be ready to cut the holes in my transom for the exhaust. The current set up is through hub. I plan to use CMI's provided they fit otherwise I will use Gils. I was wondering how much difference there is between the TRS and Bravo tips for the CMI's. How much difference is there between the two as far as the tips go? Angle, etc,??? Another words would it be incorrect to purchase a a set of used CMI tips that were used in a Bravo application? This is for a twin engine application.



Thanksm
John
getrdunn is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 04:38 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
LAKE EFFECT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lake Erie, Ohio
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With a TRS drive the exhaust is 12" farther away from the transom then in a Bravo boat. I dont know if CMI makes a different tailpipe for the TRS, but I know IMCO made a riser that was 3" and 6" higher then the std Bravo setup.

Your dealing with a one off thing. Basic things to keep in mind are that the holes in the transom are above the water line and that the tailpipes and water hoses keep flowing down from the manifold to the transom. And because your engines are 1' farther away from the transom then a Bravo boat, a Bravo taipipe/riser is going to force you to put the hole in the transom lower. If that hole is above the water line, I dont think you will have a problem. Good luck.

LE
LAKE EFFECT is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 08:05 PM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LAKE EFFECT
With a TRS drive the exhaust is 12" farther away from the transom then in a Bravo boat. I dont know if CMI makes a different tailpipe for the TRS, but I know IMCO made a riser that was 3" and 6" higher then the std Bravo setup.

Your dealing with a one off thing. Basic things to keep in mind are that the holes in the transom are above the water line and that the tailpipes and water hoses keep flowing down from the manifold to the transom. And because your engines are 1' farther away from the transom then a Bravo boat, a Bravo taipipe/riser is going to force you to put the hole in the transom lower. If that hole is above the water line, I dont think you will have a problem. Good luck.

LE
Thanks,
So I would assume the angle is different on the TRS and Bravo risers. TRS risers having less of an angle to keep the risers up higher at the transom??? Is this correct?
getrdunn is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 04:34 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
LAKE EFFECT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lake Erie, Ohio
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
Thanks,
So I would assume the angle is different on the TRS and Bravo risers. TRS risers having less of an angle to keep the risers up higher at the transom??? Is this correct?
I wouldnt say less angle, but a taller riser. Two examples: I had a Formula 311 w/TRS's and Formula used the std Merc exhaust but used a 3" Merc spacer between the manifold and riser. and as mentioned IMCO has a riser that is 3" or 6" higher then the std riser. IMCO's std riser will mimic the same height and angle as a Merc exhaust and riser w/o a spacer.

I believe a couple other aftermarket companies may offer a spacer with there exhausts as well. Just keep the risers as high as your engine compartment will allow, which will help with a possible reversion problem and keep the thru hull's up high as well. Dont be afraid to use 4" exhaust hose to compensate for slight misalignment issues as long as you keep a downward angle to the transom.

Hope this helps.

LE
LAKE EFFECT is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 07:18 PM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LAKE EFFECT
I wouldnt say less angle, but a taller riser. Two examples: I had a Formula 311 w/TRS's and Formula used the std Merc exhaust but used a 3" Merc spacer between the manifold and riser. and as mentioned IMCO has a riser that is 3" or 6" higher then the std riser. IMCO's std riser will mimic the same height and angle as a Merc exhaust and riser w/o a spacer.

I believe a couple other aftermarket companies may offer a spacer with there exhausts as well. Just keep the risers as high as your engine compartment will allow, which will help with a possible reversion problem and keep the thru hull's up high as well. Dont be afraid to use 4" exhaust hose to compensate for slight misalignment issues as long as you keep a downward angle to the transom.

Hope this helps.

LE
Thanks,
With That said - what is the desired / mercruiser location for the exhaust holes in a TRS application. I would like to be as close as possible givin that I may change from CMI's to Gils down the road. I have no problem cutting the holes, just want to have them in a so called correct place. LOL...

Just wondering what website would help me out in regards to hole placement. (stock) The way my CMI's are I am a reluctant to go by them. I would rather rig my way to get through the transom so to speak than be dissapionted later if I change the exhaust out. Unless I were to install the engines with the gils and gil risers and take proper measurements and then cut however I would rather mount the CMI's on the engines outside of the boat.

Thanks again for your help.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 10:21 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
AIR TIME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: EASTON MA.
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Originally Posted by getrdunn
Thanks,
With That said - what is the desired / mercruiser location for the exhaust holes in a TRS application. I would like to be as close as possible givin that I may change from CMI's to Gils down the road. I have no problem cutting the holes, just want to have them in a so called correct place. LOL...

Just wondering what website would help me out in regards to hole placement. (stock) The way my CMI's are I am a reluctant to go by them. I would rather rig my way to get through the transom so to speak than be dissapionted later if I change the exhaust out. Unless I were to install the engines with the gils and gil risers and take proper measurements and then cut however I would rather mount the CMI's on the engines outside of the boat.

Thanks again for your help.
best bet get exhaust 1st then put your header or manifold on then take a pvc pipe 4'' and cut it next to the transom while its lined up on the header make your mark cut out if you do it right your new tails should slide in place. you can't mark it with the sstails unless they stop at the transom and you have a rubber hose and tips. my sm exhaust was threw hull and I did't use pvc 1st time I thought the hole was off a 1/2 but over 3ft long it was 4''. if you don't under stand call me Iwill explain art 617 833 3327
AIR TIME is offline  
Old 12-05-2009, 01:05 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I ordered a set of platinum finish CMI E-tops with polished full length dry pipes thru the transom for my 509/TRS set up in the Cig. CMI will have you take few measurements from the crankshaft centerline at the transom and have them faxed or called in.

The result for my application were standard height E-tops and trs length tailpipes that fit like a glove.

Excellent fit, finish, performance, and sound with a two year warranty. Cost was $6,996 for both motors through Offshore Performance in Ft. Myers, FL.

http://www.offshoreperformance.com/O...20Draft6X8.htm
US MUSL is offline  
Old 04-01-2016, 07:25 PM
  #8  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
14 apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 2,139
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

update! Was tying to help and I found this.
14 apache is offline  
Old 04-01-2016, 08:32 PM
  #9  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Wow time flies.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 04-01-2016, 08:34 PM
  #10  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Come to find out through the etops are about the only exhaust that will work with my narrow centers. In regards to the tails either bravo or trs would work from what I can see. With the merctrans there isn't enough difference for either not to work in my application anyway.
getrdunn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.