Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
4 blade prop vs 5 blade >

4 blade prop vs 5 blade

Notices
Formula

4 blade prop vs 5 blade

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-19-2009, 05:19 PM
  #1  
Registered
VIP Member
Thread Starter
 
Godacious!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4 blade prop vs 5 blade

I am still playing with propellers on my 496HO/353. Some of my friends say stick with the Bravo 4 blades like the ones that came new on my boat. Other friends say go with the 5 blade. What are the advantages and disadvantages? Anyone have an opinion?
Godacious! is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:21 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: bristol,Ct
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am in no way an expert in this field but I am learning so some one correct me if I'm wronge. A 5 blade will have less slip,better out of the hole but will also be harder on drives. Esp. on Bravo 1's. You will loose some rpm on top but your slip will be lower.I was looking into the same idea for mine but with a 38 and B1's much of OSO said to stay away from 5 blades. My X is also pretty low so I'm going with a spacer first. A 4 blade will slip more and your drives will thank you.

Last edited by tcuda499; 12-19-2009 at 06:24 PM.
tcuda499 is offline  
Old 12-23-2009, 11:23 AM
  #3  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Barrydet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default 353 propellers

I have a 353/496HO combo also. The boat was delivered with Bravo 1 28's. With this set up, I would consistently turn 4700 WOT rpm's at 72mph. I typically travel with a full load of fuel (153gals). I am also very gentle while climbing onto plane.

Here is where the fun starts: I had a set of Maximus 15x30 from my previous formula 312. I did not want to them to go to waste. I consulted with Brett at BBlades. He performed some magic on the blades and trimmed off the diffuser rings. With this set up, I would consistently turn 4600rpm at 69mph. I noticed that the Maximus props pushed the boat out of the hole much "easier". I also noticed that my cruise speed at 3500rpm was 3mph higher. That fact equated to better MPG that I could see on my smartcraft display. I have been pleased with the performance of the Maximus props, but I have felt that I was at the bottom end of the WOT capabilitiy of the engines. I went looking for more...

This summer, I invested in the CMI Sportubes. Although the install process presented unforeseen challenges, Bob and Tanner from Full Throttle Marine, Spicewood, TX completed the project. I was seeking additional rpms at WOT. Here are the results: With the Sportubes installed the engines are now turning 4900rpm WOT at 74mph with the Maximus props. I am so pleased with this performance, that I have not used the Bravo 1's to get some comparitive numbers. I suspect that the Bravo 1's would provide some additional rpm's and mph. I plan to make the switch one day soon and try them out. I have also read that some folks are using Bravo 1 26's to get into the higher end of the WOT range. I hope to try that combination also just to see the results.

Hope this information is helpful, and by the way, all speeds were registered with a gps equipped speedometer.
Barrydet is offline  
Old 12-23-2009, 12:14 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 1,442
Received 19 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Barrydet
I have a 353/496HO combo also. The boat was delivered with Bravo 1 28's. With this set up, I would consistently turn 4700 WOT rpm's at 72mph. I typically travel with a full load of fuel (153gals). I am also very gentle while climbing onto plane.

Here is where the fun starts: I had a set of Maximus 15x30 from my previous formula 312. I did not want to them to go to waste. I consulted with Brett at BBlades. He performed some magic on the blades and trimmed off the diffuser rings. With this set up, I would consistently turn 4600rpm at 69mph. I noticed that the Maximus props pushed the boat out of the hole much "easier". I also noticed that my cruise speed at 3500rpm was 3mph higher. That fact equated to better MPG that I could see on my smartcraft display. I have been pleased with the performance of the Maximus props, but I have felt that I was at the bottom end of the WOT capabilitiy of the engines. I went looking for more...

This summer, I invested in the CMI Sportubes. Although the install process presented unforeseen challenges, Bob and Tanner from Full Throttle Marine, Spicewood, TX completed the project. I was seeking additional rpms at WOT. Here are the results: With the Sportubes installed the engines are now turning 4900rpm WOT at 74mph with the Maximus props. I am so pleased with this performance, that I have not used the Bravo 1's to get some comparitive numbers. I suspect that the Bravo 1's would provide some additional rpm's and mph. I plan to make the switch one day soon and try them out. I have also read that some folks are using Bravo 1 26's to get into the higher end of the WOT range. I hope to try that combination also just to see the results.

Hope this information is helpful, and by the way, all speeds were registered with a gps equipped speedometer.
Great info. Sounds like you are really getting her dialed in! Always good to have the engines able to run at their target rpm.
4mulafastech is offline  
Old 12-23-2009, 06:37 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: bristol,Ct
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

are the Maximus 15x30 4 or 5 blade? nice call on the cmi's
tcuda499 is offline  
Old 12-23-2009, 07:41 PM
  #6  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Barrydet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Maximus is mercury's 5 blade propeller.
Barrydet is offline  
Old 12-23-2009, 09:17 PM
  #7  
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
 
Audiofn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Carlisle, MA USA
Posts: 18,422
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

They are HELL on lower units!!!
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Old 12-25-2009, 04:29 PM
  #8  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: virginia
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How tough are 5 blades on a lower unit really,it is often a relationship of Hp, getting up on plane even if the props are 100 % hooked up you are only 3000 rpm or maybe 350 Hp, 4000 rpm 450 Hp, Bravos are rated @ 525hp. Yes they have less slip but you will turn a 4 blade XX time more to go the same distance. Anything over the rate Mercury Hp limit is when you start looking for trouble
James is offline  
Old 12-26-2009, 06:25 AM
  #9  
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
 
Audiofn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Carlisle, MA USA
Posts: 18,422
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The lack of slip is what kills the drive more often then not. That is why most recommend that you only run three blade props on TRS drive boats.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Old 12-26-2009, 07:10 AM
  #10  
21 and 42 footers
Platinum Member
 
t500hps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 8,183
Received 119 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

4 blades will get more RPM than a 5 blade so you must drop pitch and/or diameter to match RPM's with the 5 blades (this is because of less slip). That slip does help save drives but provide less "bite" on the water. 5 blades typically loose a couple MPH top end, even if matching rpm with a smaller prop, but the 5 blade will have a much better hole shot and mid-rage cruise speed.
t500hps is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.