Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Cubes Equals Economy. >

Cubes Equals Economy.

Notices

Cubes Equals Economy.

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-19-2010, 03:25 PM
  #1  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
fastlane40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Townsville Australia
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cubes Equals Economy.

38 Foot deep vee.What differences will be seen going from 420hp 502's to 800hp 632's?
At the same speed will fuel useage be the same?
Forget the drives,maintenance etc.Just interested in your thoughts on fuel burn.
fastlane40 is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 04:25 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

More Hp, & Cubes = more fuel
Greenkeeper is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 12:41 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Wink More is More!

An 800 HP 632 engine is going to have a much greater BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) than a 420HP 502, period!
The 800 hp engine is going to allow you to cruise at a faster speed or lower rpm than current 502 and that will save some fuel while running but the higher horspower potential of the 632 at speed will use a lot more fuel than the 502, but the speeds will be much greater. You see where I am going here?

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 02:48 AM
  #4  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
fastlane40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Townsville Australia
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raylar
An 800 HP 632 engine is going to have a much greater BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) than a 420HP 502, period!
The 800 hp engine is going to allow you to cruise at a faster speed or lower rpm than current 502 and that will save some fuel while running but the higher horspower potential of the 632 at speed will use a lot more fuel than the 502, but the speeds will be much greater. You see where I am going here?

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
So say both are running @ 45mph,will the 632's use more fuel than the 502's.Guessing that the 502's are turning 4000 and the 632's maybe 3000 or less.
fastlane40 is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 03:49 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
PatriYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waterford,MI
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My guess is at the same speed, the bigger engines will use about the same amount of fuel. Will you always go the same speed? Not very likely
PatriYacht is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 04:06 PM
  #6  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
fastlane40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Townsville Australia
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PatriYacht
My guess is at the same speed, the bigger engines will use about the same amount of fuel. Will you always go the same speed? Not very likely
Okay so if at the same speed they both burn the same amount but running the big motors "faster" will use more fuel.Going from A to B i will get there quicker so therefore they won't be running as long.
I'm just trying to work out if i pull the small motors and fit the big.I already have both sets.
I use this boat around the islands and out to the reef.
If the both would use the same amount at the same speed i would be happy and do the swap.
fastlane40 is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 04:32 PM
  #7  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fastlane40
Okay so if at the same speed they both burn the same amount but running the big motors "faster" will use more fuel.Going from A to B i will get there quicker so therefore they won't be running as long.
Yup! I found that out when I went from my Scarab to the Apache.... I assumed I would be spending a ton more on fuel.

When I had the Scarab I'd burn 30 gallons per hour at cruise, which was 3700 rpms or 50 mph. Engines were 502", NA about 500-550 hp.

On the Apache (6 ft longer and a lot heavier), I burn 40 gallons per hour at 3700 rpms but now I'm running 61 mph at those R's. Plus, if I want to slow down to say 3200 rpms (50 mph) I will actually burn a little "less" fuel than the Scarab did at 3700. Engines are 580", blown, 830 hp.

So for 6 ft. in boat length, a couple thousand extra pounds, roughly 300 hp difference per engine and 10 mph gain in cruise, my fuel costs have largely remained the same.

However, get above 4200 rpms when the boost kicks in and all these figures quickly go out the window!!
Panther is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 04:53 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do get to buy one of your 502s off you if you swap them out?
Ghostrider is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 05:47 PM
  #9  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Fixx

632's big wheels and 2 speed trannys with OD
FIXX is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 06:43 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake Travis ,Texas
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

A lot depends on how that hp is made.

an 800hp engine with an efficient blower like a whipple and a perfectly tuned EFI setup will get way better mpg than an 800hp with a big old fashioned roots blower and a couple Holley dominators.
Then again it will cost a lot more up front so comes down to when/where are you gonna spend the green.
HTRDLNCN is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.