Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
CMI Headers vs Stainless Marine >

CMI Headers vs Stainless Marine

Notices

CMI Headers vs Stainless Marine

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-30-2014, 05:31 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Craney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clayton NJ
Posts: 2,450
Received 408 Likes on 182 Posts
Default CMI Headers vs Stainless Marine

Last night a friend & I talking about his motor rebuild, he said he needs new headers his are starting to leak. I said go with Stainless Marine, he said they are only good to 600 hp (I laughed) he says the CMI make more power then SM. Lets hear what you guys think about this debate.
Craney is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 05:54 AM
  #2  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Grand Rapids, Mi
Posts: 2,687
Received 234 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Have never heard either of those statements. SM makes a great product. Just not as flashy
Drock78 is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 06:13 AM
  #3  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: bel air, md
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

stainless Marine makes the highest horsepower rated marine exhaust. And the upside of having the best exhaust is it will not ruin your motor.
Black Baja is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 07:29 AM
  #4  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was sold on the SM's when I read about their design strategy- cast a good manifold, then weld on a lightweight water jacket. They can better control and inspect the base manifold this way and that's the important piece. IIRC, the manifold is 3x thicker than the jacket, idea being that any corrosion issues will have you leaking water into the bilge (where it's visible) and not into your exhaust path.
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 07:36 AM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: bel air, md
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cole2534
I was sold on the SM's when I read about their design strategy- cast a good manifold, then weld on a lightweight water jacket. They can better control and inspect the base manifold this way and that's the important piece. IIRC, the manifold is 3x thicker than the jacket, idea being that any corrosion issues will have you leaking water into the bilge (where it's visible) and not into your exhaust path.
There are a few engineers that actually have a brain.
Black Baja is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 07:49 AM
  #6  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks?

There's a good comparison chart with a lot of exhausts represented and their dyno performance on an HP500. I posted it in a recent thread.

Edited, had wrong 500 in there.

Last edited by Cole2534; 11-30-2014 at 08:27 AM.
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 07:56 AM
  #7  
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (3)
 
vintage chromoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 2,634
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I get that the manifold type exhaust systems will outperform a tubular header in terms of not leaking.
What I don't understand is how a "log" style short primary length system can outperform a long primary tubular header. Is the scavanging effect that the tuned primary headers offer not an important factor on a relatively large displacement BBC in the rpm range we use them?
vintage chromoly is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 08:02 AM
  #8  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the KE's perform like a header, but the others fall short. It's the typical performance/headache/cost balance, IMHO.
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 08:10 AM
  #9  
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (3)
 
vintage chromoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 2,634
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cole2534
I think the KE's perform like a header, but the others fall short. It's the typical performance/headache/cost balance, IMHO.
So, a tubular header does offer a performance advantage over the stainless marine manifolds but, at the cost of reliability?
vintage chromoly is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 08:20 AM
  #10  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think so. Dyno data shows the headers to make more power and this board will have you believe that no header goes without issue.

Dyno chart thread- http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...no-charts.html

Other relevant info- http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...l-failing.html

Last edited by Cole2534; 11-30-2014 at 08:25 AM.
Cole2534 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.