Notices

Nose cones

Old 02-28-2017, 10:51 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cape coral, FL
Posts: 4,189
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default Nose cones

Anyone using any on regular bravo drives? Any input? anyone see any gains? Just curious.
Crude Intentions is offline  
Old 02-28-2017, 11:01 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 3,570
Received 121 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I hear unless over 65 they are useless and more prone to screw with the drives characteristics.
f_inscreenname is offline  
Old 03-01-2017, 01:04 AM
  #3  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,553
Received 1,813 Likes on 903 Posts
Default

I have them on my AT. It was a 100mph boat when it was originally built with them though. Alaways had them so don't know if they help or hurt anything. Most likely don't do anything at the speeds I run.

I had one on my 28 Pantera when I bought it. I swapped to a DWP lower. It carried the bow slightly better with the DWP lower.
No WOT speed change. It was a 65-67 mph boat.

Rule of thumb is if you are not 85+ mph, they won't do anything.
Griff is offline  
Old 03-01-2017, 06:01 AM
  #4  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
articfriends's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: frankenmuth michigan
Posts: 7,140
Received 814 Likes on 373 Posts
Default

My 272 baja ran around 92 mph with well blended hydrotive nose cone on std bravo lower hsg when it only had 950hp , without it when running spare drive would only go 89 or so. Later on when it had more hp ran 96 ish with my 92 octane tune and 99 ish on kill, a vert shaft sheared off and destroyed the fastest lower hsg i owned with the well blended hydromotive nose cone and boat lost 2 mph even with another one on another drive. Had that on and off boat several times filling, welding, grinding and sanding, profiling so i say yes, they make a big difference if your v hull runs into the 90+mph range. On s 65 mph boat, well, it looks kool but i here it slows you down and if you DONT have twin ram full hyd steering the extra length tends to toss boat around and amplify chine walk.

Last edited by articfriends; 03-01-2017 at 06:03 AM.
articfriends is offline  
Old 03-01-2017, 10:18 AM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cape coral, FL
Posts: 4,189
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

For reference I should be 90+ when motors are finished. It's got full hydraulic.
Crude Intentions is offline  
Old 03-01-2017, 10:45 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lakewood, NY, USA
Posts: 3,482
Received 317 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

I was told that nose cones were the most helpful on the original Bravo design lowers. If I remember correctly, Merc came out with a improved design in the early 90s.

Padraig

Last edited by Padraig; 03-01-2017 at 05:56 PM.
Padraig is offline  
Old 03-01-2017, 01:31 PM
  #7  
BUP
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

^^^^ That's correct the original Bravo design - certain nose cones helped, It was early 90's the Bravo Lowers changed in which helped without using a nose cone.

The old claims thru out the whole 1990's was if you had a boat over 70 mph, a nose would help, then after 2000 year models, it was said if you have boat over 80 mph, nose cones would help, currently If I recall correctly, the claims seem to be if you have boat over 90 mph a nose could help. IMO also a lot depends on how it is installed ( symmetrically perfect straight and blended very well and symmetrically streamlined even on both sides )
BUP is offline  
Old 03-01-2017, 02:16 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wouldn't it be more effective to just go with a sportmaster bravo lower? Then you would know the shape is consistent. (I realize the cost would be much more than just a nose cone)
TorchLK is offline  
Old 03-01-2017, 03:04 PM
  #9  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cape coral, FL
Posts: 4,189
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TorchLK
Wouldn't it be more effective to just go with a sportmaster bravo lower? Then you would know the shape is consistent. (I realize the cost would be much more than just a nose cone)
Yes. For the ultimate plan is -2s sc lower. Looking at 5k+ for a pair. Nose cones are $1-200. Just curious if the cone would be beneficial until I get the shorties
Crude Intentions is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.