Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
496MAG vs. 496MAG HO >

496MAG vs. 496MAG HO

Notices

496MAG vs. 496MAG HO

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-02-2003, 07:34 AM
  #1  
patrick22309
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question 496MAG vs. 496MAG HO

Looking at a couple boats with the above listed power. Is there any physical differece inside these two motors, or just tuning to get a few more HP out of the HO?
 
Old 09-02-2003, 10:12 AM
  #2  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
CigDaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 21,346
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

There are some physical differences internally. The MAG-HO had a forged steel crank and the MAG has a cast iron crank. Other than that, it's a different cam and programming.

Last edited by Baja Daze; 09-02-2003 at 10:21 AM.
CigDaze is offline  
Old 09-02-2003, 10:12 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,235
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think there's an outside physical difference but internally there are a few. The HO has better crank shaft, cams, and pistons that have a greater wear factor and are much more capable of taking on any modifications like a supercharger. My recommendation is to get the HO motor. You'll love the extra 50 horses and the upgradability.
Vyper340 is offline  
Old 09-02-2003, 10:15 AM
  #4  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
CigDaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 21,346
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Here are the spec sheets for both:

496 standard

496 HO
CigDaze is offline  
Old 09-02-2003, 01:37 PM
  #5  
srpbaer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Baja Daze, what you say is true, or I should say "used" to be true...Latest information is now the crank is the same as the one used in the HO was overkill!!!!! Now the only difference is the cam and slight tuning of the ecm to include the higher rev limiter...No longer different cranks...
Just my .02 worth....and Mercrusier's
 
Old 09-02-2003, 03:46 PM
  #6  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
CigDaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 21,346
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

srpbaer,

It's funny, because I had originally written what you said, remembering that the change was made for both versions to be cast...This was also reflected in the GM specs(same one's I posted above) during that time.

But now once again, if you look closely at the specs, they are different in the crank: HO has forged, standard has cast...That's why I edited my original post.

Did they go back to forged on the HO? Or does GM have a typo?

Last edited by Baja Daze; 09-02-2003 at 03:48 PM.
CigDaze is offline  
Old 09-03-2003, 07:09 PM
  #7  
srpbaer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Daze, I too was told two different stories and finally asked the tech at the dealersip..His reply was it depends on when the motor was made...early ones had differetn cranks and the later ones are all the sames...Now just what does that mean?????? I think he means they changed it in mid-year but did not change the spec sheets posted on the net...Just my guess!!!!
 
Old 09-04-2003, 01:56 PM
  #8  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
CigDaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 21,346
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally posted by srpbaer
I think he means they changed it in mid-year but did not change the spec sheets posted on the net...Just my guess!!!!
That's probably the case. Thanks.
CigDaze is offline  
Old 09-04-2003, 09:35 PM
  #9  
Ric232
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, that's correct. It is a mistake by GM. If you look at the spec sheet on the HP3 motor, even it has a cast crank.
 
Old 09-09-2003, 12:48 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fairfax, Va.
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as of 9/9/2003, in the GM Website... The "specs" on the HO list the forged steel crank but the "description/paragraph" portion has it listed as a nodular cast crank.
Go Figure!
L8Shift is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rdegeo4140
Formula
24
08-02-2012 04:59 PM
jonyb
Baja
7
04-29-2006 09:39 PM
dmann
General Boating Discussion
0
01-02-2004 09:53 PM
fmi
Formula
0
08-05-2003 06:18 PM
boatinbill
General Q & A
6
07-15-2002 10:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: 496MAG vs. 496MAG HO


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.