Procharge 350Mag vs 6.2
#1
Charter Member #795
Charter Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hebron, KY
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Procharge 350Mag vs 6.2
On a Formula 292 (current hull design) which power plants are the better candidate for pro or whipple chargers - the 350Mag or the 6.2's?
#7
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A buddy procharged his 6.2's in his 292 formula fast tech. These boats are a biatch to get on plane and worse after prochared beacuse of the larger props. You're going to want as much low end torgue as you can get. I think the 6.2 are tourqier(is that a word) than the 5.7. I'd go for the 6.2's
Brian
Brian
#8
Charter Member #795
Charter Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hebron, KY
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the insight Caincando1
So your buddy wouldn't go that route again? Perhaps 377 Scorpions are the better choice normally aspirated.
So your buddy wouldn't go that route again? Perhaps 377 Scorpions are the better choice normally aspirated.
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
I believe either are equil canidates, I don't know if the 6.2 is more "stout" in the bottom end, but I can tell you
that it's nothing but a destroked 400 and uses a 350
crankshaft. They are both well balanced engines, but
hp to $.....the 350 would be the better choice. In a procharged application you wouldn't notice much differance. I also agree, a larger oil cooler would be
a good idea, especially if you plan on running the boat hard.
that it's nothing but a destroked 400 and uses a 350
crankshaft. They are both well balanced engines, but
hp to $.....the 350 would be the better choice. In a procharged application you wouldn't notice much differance. I also agree, a larger oil cooler would be
a good idea, especially if you plan on running the boat hard.