Tow vehicule advice
04-22-2004, 07:57 PM
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Tow vehicule advice
I found a really decent deal on a GMC 2500 4x4.
It's got a C6P (heavy duty tow pack, with 4.10 dif.)
A pretty clean truck.
My only concern is about the wheelbase. It's a REG cab with long bed. Wheelbase is 131.5 inches.
I heard a lot of guys claiming that a tow vehicle should at least have a 150 and + wheelbase.
Now, considering that the truck will be used to tow 29' and less boats...?
Your opinions would be appreciated.
Thanks
It's got a C6P (heavy duty tow pack, with 4.10 dif.)
A pretty clean truck.
My only concern is about the wheelbase. It's a REG cab with long bed. Wheelbase is 131.5 inches.
I heard a lot of guys claiming that a tow vehicle should at least have a 150 and + wheelbase.
Now, considering that the truck will be used to tow 29' and less boats...?
Your opinions would be appreciated.
Thanks
04-22-2004, 09:36 PM
#2
Registered
Would you think twice pulling that with a 2500 suburban? They are about the length of the truck you're considering.
Havaing had a standard cab truck before though, the lack of room inside becomes a pain in the rear.
Havaing had a standard cab truck before though, the lack of room inside becomes a pain in the rear.
04-22-2004, 10:22 PM
#4
Registered
I've towed with an S10 Blazer, a full size Bronco, Supercab F250 longbed, Crewcab F350 longbed, and now a dually Crewcab F350 longbed, in that order. Note that the wheelbase got progressively longer. Longer wheelbase equals stability.
If you can swing it, go with a diesel, too. The torque difference allows your cruise control to be useful. I also prefer a stick with overdrive, but that's just personal preference. With a manual, there's one less thing to overheat.
Cheers,
Brian
If you can swing it, go with a diesel, too. The torque difference allows your cruise control to be useful. I also prefer a stick with overdrive, but that's just personal preference. With a manual, there's one less thing to overheat.
Cheers,
Brian
04-23-2004, 06:23 AM
#6
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: pa
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mike i had a v10 before my power stroke the v 10 works great but it shifts alot on hills and drinks fuel as where the power stroke is much better on fuel and pulls better.
32 thunder rick
32 thunder rick
04-23-2004, 11:23 AM
#7
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a GMC with 131.5.
26 foot boat, twins. No problem. Backs up great.
A shorter tow vehicle and longer trailer is good for backing.
A longer tow vehicle and a shorter trailer is good for going forward. Ask yourself where do you want the advantage?
(You did say that the wheelbase is primary concern.)
I will say I like the extended cab, though.
26 foot boat, twins. No problem. Backs up great.
A shorter tow vehicle and longer trailer is good for backing.
A longer tow vehicle and a shorter trailer is good for going forward. Ask yourself where do you want the advantage?
(You did say that the wheelbase is primary concern.)
I will say I like the extended cab, though.
NOW! 
04-25-2004, 10:44 PM
#9
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Troutly for the feed back. I'll look at the PSD.
Originally posted by Troutly
I ran a 2000 F-350 Crew Cab SRW with the 7.3 for two years. I then went with a 2002 F-350 Crew Cab SRW with V-10 and 4.30 gears. Not a lot of difference between these two packages. The bigest difference was the V-10 would het 7-9 MPG towinng 12K and the 7.3 would get 10-11 MPG. THe 7.3 would also hold the speed better on grades. That V-10 was so smooth and quiet...
Now, I just got the 6.0 PSD in a 2004 F-350 Crew Cab SRW and there is a world of difference between this package and the above two. The 6.0 runs VERY strong.
For 2005 the V-10 gets the 3 valve engine and the Torq Shift 5 speed auto. That should be a much improved package.
I ran a 2000 F-350 Crew Cab SRW with the 7.3 for two years. I then went with a 2002 F-350 Crew Cab SRW with V-10 and 4.30 gears. Not a lot of difference between these two packages. The bigest difference was the V-10 would het 7-9 MPG towinng 12K and the 7.3 would get 10-11 MPG. THe 7.3 would also hold the speed better on grades. That V-10 was so smooth and quiet...
Now, I just got the 6.0 PSD in a 2004 F-350 Crew Cab SRW and there is a world of difference between this package and the above two. The 6.0 runs VERY strong.
For 2005 the V-10 gets the 3 valve engine and the Torq Shift 5 speed auto. That should be a much improved package.
04-26-2004, 06:38 AM
#10
speel chekk this fokker!
Charter Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Locust Valley, New York
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i tow a 27' scarab (1987 old and heavy) with a gmc 1500 pickup with an extended cab and a shortbed and it has no problem.
I also tow a 20' enclosed race car trailer with it and it does just fine with that too. Made it to florida (from NY)and back over the winter with no problems.
I also tow a 20' enclosed race car trailer with it and it does just fine with that too. Made it to florida (from NY)and back over the winter with no problems.
__________________
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
THRILLSEEKER
General Boating Discussion
10
01-29-2003 12:02 PM
