Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Cigarette
Top Gun fuel burn good & bad >

Top Gun fuel burn good & bad

Notices

Top Gun fuel burn good & bad

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-30-2009, 01:59 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Florida & Tarpon Springs Florida
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c_deezy
How many gallons do the straight bottom TG's hold? I thought there were two 80 gallon tanks, are they 90 gallon tanks?
1998 Top Gun 127 gallons each side
tanner is offline  
Old 05-30-2009, 08:07 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
thisistank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Posts: 13,704
Received 3,019 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Biggus
No idea Tank. What's your fuel burn?

Should I think 22 gals/hr is good?
I don't know (either question).

I always thought fuel burn per hour is kind've pointless since you have idle time, non-boost time and boost time and it could change all the time. I always thought miles per gallon would be a bit better of an estimate.

I saw on some thread sometime ago someone had an 800hp blown motor on a dyno with a fuel meter. It burned a gallon a minute at WOT.

So I always thought, with my small 525's with the baby blowers, if I used this measurment as a guideline it would be conservative. So I figure if I ran at around 60 mph and went off the Gallon per minute measurement, it would roughly equal 2 gallons per mile (gallon a motor). And it would all equal out in the end with idling time (less fuel) and bumping the speed up and getting into the blowers (more fuel).

So with 180 gallons or so you get 90-100 miles (or so). Which is kind've backed up when we run a Twin Step (better fuel economy w/525EFI and TS) to Key West from Miami. 180 miles one way and can do it on one fill up (one way) with 210 gallons of fuel running around 70 mph (average). So he's getting almost twice the fuel economy but since I'm being super conservative (mile per gallon) I'd say he's actually getting 1/3 better fuel economy in reality. Because in all reality I'm probably actually getting a bit over a mile per gallon between both motors.

It makes sense to me and seems to work out well when I'm averaging fuel to put in and where we're running too (i.e. to the islands 14-20 miles out and 14 - 20 miles back). But then again, I run the boat pretty conservative and try to stay out of the blowers which of course helps fuel economy.

Last edited by thisistank; 05-30-2009 at 08:20 PM.
thisistank is offline  
Old 05-31-2009, 04:06 PM
  #13  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Zero Patience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Crystal River Fl,USA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

59-60 mph cruise @3500, old straight bottom 38 with Chief 800s. 13,000 pounds full.
1.2-1.25 miles per gallon. Hering 16 inch diameter, 5 blades. The tanks hold 130 gallons each. Kurt, set your GPS trip to 0 on the next fill up.
1.2 mpg is better than a 30 foot fishing boat with twin Yamaha 250s, that cruises at 32 miles per hour.
Attached Thumbnails Top Gun fuel burn good & bad-dsc00533-800x600-.jpg  
Zero Patience is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.