1.50 to 1.36 74 mph boat...
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mine Hill, NJ/Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1.50 to 1.36 74 mph boat...
Any pros/cons going from a 1.5 to 1.36 on a relatively slow boat? Turning damaged 28 B1's to 5,000 with the 1.5's with a max of 74.3.
#4
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mine Hill, NJ/Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Been There Done That!
You my gain a little top end, but you will loose torque.
I did this on my Nordic and wound up switching back.
Your prop will be spinning faster but with less power to push.
1.50 w/b1 28 pitch 77-78 mph consistantly reguardless of load.
1.36 w/b1 26 pitch 79-81 mph inconsistantly and more sensiitive to loads in boat.
Keep this in mind also, you are now spinning your propshaft faster which means more stress on you lower unit. I had to have mine rebuilt after 2 years with the 1.36 set-up.
You will also need to play the prop game again to find what works best.
You my gain a little top end, but you will loose torque.
I did this on my Nordic and wound up switching back.
Your prop will be spinning faster but with less power to push.
1.50 w/b1 28 pitch 77-78 mph consistantly reguardless of load.
1.36 w/b1 26 pitch 79-81 mph inconsistantly and more sensiitive to loads in boat.
Keep this in mind also, you are now spinning your propshaft faster which means more stress on you lower unit. I had to have mine rebuilt after 2 years with the 1.36 set-up.
You will also need to play the prop game again to find what works best.
#8
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mine Hill, NJ/Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for everything.
#9
Registered
Can someone explain this in better detail?
For example, I have 1.65 drives on my 28 ZX (6.2's). but the 350 Mag boats have 1.5 drives. The prop pitch on the 350 is 23 and on the 6.2 it's 25.
Mathematically it's a wash. I have noticed differences because, what I think, prop diameter differences but that's about it.
With this 1.36 / 1.5 question it is almost the same. The MPH changes only by 2 top end with the 1.36 with a reduction in prop pitch by 2 inches.
For example, I have 1.65 drives on my 28 ZX (6.2's). but the 350 Mag boats have 1.5 drives. The prop pitch on the 350 is 23 and on the 6.2 it's 25.
Mathematically it's a wash. I have noticed differences because, what I think, prop diameter differences but that's about it.
With this 1.36 / 1.5 question it is almost the same. The MPH changes only by 2 top end with the 1.36 with a reduction in prop pitch by 2 inches.
#10
Registered
iTrader: (4)
Can someone explain this in better detail?
For example, I have 1.65 drives on my 28 ZX (6.2's). but the 350 Mag boats have 1.5 drives. The prop pitch on the 350 is 23 and on the 6.2 it's 25.
Mathematically it's a wash. I have noticed differences because, what I think, prop diameter differences but that's about it.
With this 1.36 / 1.5 question it is almost the same. The MPH changes only by 2 top end with the 1.36 with a reduction in prop pitch by 2 inches.
For example, I have 1.65 drives on my 28 ZX (6.2's). but the 350 Mag boats have 1.5 drives. The prop pitch on the 350 is 23 and on the 6.2 it's 25.
Mathematically it's a wash. I have noticed differences because, what I think, prop diameter differences but that's about it.
With this 1.36 / 1.5 question it is almost the same. The MPH changes only by 2 top end with the 1.36 with a reduction in prop pitch by 2 inches.
Think of your old ten speed bike, you could put in it top gear and spin the peddals slower but harder to have that top speed. You friend is next to you peddling faster in a lower gear but going the same speed. You both stop and don't shift, then take off from the dead stop? Who has the easier time getting that bike back on plane?