Notices

extending stock risers

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-01-2017, 07:15 PM
  #21  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 136
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan00TJ
I ran 1.6 rockers on intake with that cam for more lift/duration. Installed straight up as it has 2* advance ground in. With my AFR 190R heads it pulled very nice to 5600rpms. With it in a 383 it will be all in at 5000-5200 roughly. Mine were the 620-32420. If adding extensions these are what you want. The inner exhaust pipe is extended past the outer water jacket making it easier to weld too vs the 32410.
Ryan, did you ever dyno that engine? Just curious as those are the heads I am using for this engine. Do you think there was anything to gain with putting 1.6's on the exhaust or did the grind have enough duration even with wet exhaust? I'm going to start with the 600 edelbrock carb I have from my current 383 setup. Depending on where it drops off on top end, I'm putting together a 750 DP Holley to try as well.
94sylvan is offline  
Old 01-01-2017, 07:46 PM
  #22  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,545
Received 3,115 Likes on 1,402 Posts
Default

Time will be better spent with the Holley.


Ryan's 1984 Hammond Challenger MKII V2150 ran 80.5mph with that motor.
http://www.speedwake.com/forums/107-...tml#post681072

Last edited by SB; 01-01-2017 at 07:50 PM.
SB is offline  
Old 01-01-2017, 08:21 PM
  #23  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 136
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
Time will be better spent with the Holley.


Ryan's 1984 Hammond Challenger MKII V2150 ran 80.5mph with that motor.
http://www.speedwake.com/forums/107-...tml#post681072
I know SB, but I only have a 30 gal. fuel tank My boat is very close in weight and dimension to that Challenger and I would hope a more efficient hull. Wow! Wasnt expecting those kind of numbers!!! I'm at 62 now with 340 hp.
94sylvan is offline  
Old 01-02-2017, 11:52 AM
  #24  
Registered
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tygart Lake, WV
Posts: 1,290
Received 122 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 94sylvan
Ryan, did you ever dyno that engine? Just curious as those are the heads I am using for this engine. Do you think there was anything to gain with putting 1.6's on the exhaust or did the grind have enough duration even with wet exhaust? I'm going to start with the 600 edelbrock carb I have from my current 383 setup. Depending on where it drops off on top end, I'm putting together a 750 DP Holley to try as well.
Never dyno'd. I always liked the GPS dyno. The 1.'6s on the intake were per Bob M's advice. The XM276HR is perfect for a Marine 350. In a 383 with AFR heads it will idle like a dream and have great midrange punch. IMO, if your after top end power it and a 600 carb will be disappointing. If set on the XM276 then 1.6's all around will not hurt. My HP750 and 234/240 cam made the 383 a real top end screamer.

Last edited by Ryan00TJ; 01-02-2017 at 12:14 PM.
Ryan00TJ is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 12:21 PM
  #25  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 136
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan00TJ
Never dyno'd. I always liked the GPS dyno. The 1.'6s on the intake were per Bob M's advice. The XM276HR is perfect for a Marine 350. In a 383 with AFR heads it will idle like a dream and have great midrange punch. IMO, if your after top end power it and a 600 carb will be disappointing. If set on the XM276 then 1.6's all around will not hurt. My HP750 and 234/240 cam made the 383 a real top end screamer.
Ryan, reviving this post for a little more advice. Maybe Trash and SB can chime in as well please. Finally ordering parts for motor so I can get it to the machine shop. Definitely going with the 276 comp cam. I'm needing advice on static compression ratio with this cam. My choices in d dish pistons put me at 9.35:1 or 9.77:1 with close to ideal quench. Do I play it safe or will that result in a lazy engine in the lower rpms?
94sylvan is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 12:37 PM
  #26  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,545
Received 3,115 Likes on 1,402 Posts
Default

That engine will not be lazy with the lower of the two compression's in your 383 with that cam.
SB is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 04:22 PM
  #27  
Registered
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tygart Lake, WV
Posts: 1,290
Received 122 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
That engine will not be lazy with the lower of the two compression's in your 383 with that cam.
I agree. Truthfully, I don't believe you would feel the power difference between the two ratios on the water. Running alum heads, I always shot for 10-1 static. When tuned right they ran great on 89 marina fuel. A 9.7-1 alum head SBC tuned right should be fine on marina 89 fuel. If you can't source 89, shoot for the lower compression and go boating.


I ran AC FR2LS @ .050"gap in mine. There a step colder than what AFR recommends. Holley 750HP 78P, 88S 2.5PV, 87-89 octane, 36* Timing 10.18-1 static.

Last edited by Ryan00TJ; 02-20-2017 at 04:37 PM.
Ryan00TJ is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 07:42 PM
  #28  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,545
Received 3,115 Likes on 1,402 Posts
Default

Great info. As a note, those ^^^^ plugs are no longer.
SB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.