Go Back   Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units


OSO Sponsor
NorTech
OSO Sponsor

Advertiser

Advertiser


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-02-2007, 04:45 PM   #21
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
RBeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Antioch, IL
Posts: 415
1998 Velocity 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by monstaaa View Post
of course. but from a mechanical or engineering standpoint the weak link is moved and that is fact. same issues on a high powered single engine, busted gimbal.

not blaming or trying to disuade anyone from b-max, just offering info. in my findings the stronger gears, heavier weight hanging from a pivotal point not enginered for, and larger surface area, there is an effect to the overall performance of the vessel and its attributes.
Monstaa,
I would agree that the weak link does move. That said I have not seen any additional stress in my application. In the threads discussed I believe that an impact with a foreign object had something to do with it. Any upgrade to a weak link is suggested and should be a part of your budget when considering any project. Just as I learned with my modified procharger project. A Bravo is a disposadrive in that application I don't care who is driving it is just a matter of time you'll break it.
RBeyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 05:01 PM   #22
FOUNTAIN
Platinum Member
 
monstaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: long island, newyork
Posts: 2,520
fountain
Quote:
Originally Posted by RBeyer View Post
Monstaa,
I would agree that the weak link does move. That said I have not seen any additional stress in my application. In the threads discussed I believe that an impact with a foreign object had something to do with it. Any upgrade to a weak link is suggested and should be a part of your budget when considering any project. Just as I learned with my modified procharger project. A Bravo is a disposadrive in that application I don't care who is driving it is just a matter of time you'll break it.
no impact. just high side load. off a big wake, landed to the side and bang, broken gimbal.
their is truly a reason why items are designed as a match pair. from an engineering stand point. a similiar analogy would be to analize , from a stress standpoint , the effects of using the "stern jack" on the transom assembly as a whole. big long studs into the helmu with a bilet piece of staock 6-8 inches long. not good.
as for the bravos i feel they are only as good as thier operator.
__________________
IT'S ANOTHER DAY ABOVE GROUND, SO BE THANKFUL, RUN HARD, AND HUG YOUR KID'S.
monstaaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-02-2007, 06:45 PM   #23
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
RBeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Antioch, IL
Posts: 415
1998 Velocity 280
as for the bravos i feel they are only as good as thier operator.

When you press over 600 HP thay just can't take it. I have had them grenade on glass flat water while decelerating. Some make them work but I don't think they drive them hard.
I don't know enough of the gimble situation to give an opinion I did not see the parts, etc. I've been OK so far.
RBeyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 07:54 AM   #24
FOUNTAIN
Platinum Member
 
monstaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: long island, newyork
Posts: 2,520
fountain
the unfortunare thing is that too many people "rebuild" bravos. once they grenade their petty much junk. guys rebuild them, using the same casing that has been stretched from the previous explosion.this is most of the cause ofmajor failure after initial blow up.
i have set up at least a dozen boats between 35 and 42 with bravos and 750 h.p with out reoccuring failures. and they are here on long island where you have both flat water in the large bays as well as some of the roughest inlets known.
it reall is my feeling that used properly and with proper maintanance they will live with 700+ without problem.
__________________
IT'S ANOTHER DAY ABOVE GROUND, SO BE THANKFUL, RUN HARD, AND HUG YOUR KID'S.
monstaaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 06:34 PM   #25
mdg performance
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Annapolis Md
Posts: 403
06Spectre36,07superboat Y2k
When installing a b-max drive would really consider an imco hd gimbal,especially on a cat,lots of side load with the high speeds.The b-max is heavier than the standard drive about the same weight as the bravo3(according to dean at bravo shop)the difference is bravo3 boats are lucky to do 65mph not 130mph,breaking gimbals at speed is bad news!!
MDGperformance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 02:04 AM   #26
WHYC / NIOC
VIP Member
 
Back4More's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 6,197
42 Fountain/370 SeaRay
Could you guys post some pics of the B-max's on your boat.
I would like to see some other setups.
Here's what we did.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg boxes.jpg (165.8 KB, 44 views)
__________________
Saris Racing 800SC
Bmax/-2 IMCO's
Cryo Gear sets
IMCO Boxes
MitcherT
Livorsi
Back4More is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 08:14 AM   #27
Registered
 
Canada Jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario,Canada baby!
Posts: 1,562
Sunsation and Apache
Question for Monstaaa, when it comes to a bravo drive life, do you think the oil cooler system from Drew Marine would help?

I think it would help alot in my situation. With a drive temp gage installed I found that I could get the oil in the drive VERY hot, when running hard. If the Drew Marine system keeps the oil temp low all the time, then it 'should ' help with gear and seal life right?
Canada Jeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 08:18 AM   #28
Registered
 
Canada Jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario,Canada baby!
Posts: 1,562
Sunsation and Apache
Also, about the B Max, I looked into them last summer when my bravo failed. I found a few draw backs with the B Max. I couldn't run my exhaust through the drive, I would have to buy mufflers. Also with external hydraulic steering, without modification, the steering angle is reduced. This wouldn't help when docking.

Both are liveable issues, but just wanted to add to this thread.
Canada Jeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 10:16 AM   #29
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 10,484
36' Apache
Quote:
Originally Posted by articfriends View Post
I'm under the impression that B-max only sells there drive with merc 1.36 lower gears or the other steep lower gears because the 1.36 gears have poven to be slightly more durable. I do know they are using merc lower gears,not some extra strong aftermarket version or anything. Has anyone tried re-gearing the drive with merc 15/19 1.50 lower gears? By cryoing then giving the lower gears a multi-step surface treatment that ends with them having a very smooth finish I have gotten the 15/19 1.50 gears to last much longer then they ever did in stock form on my boat with a bravo drive. My understanding is that most boats go slower when switching to a B-max because of the extra friction of the larger upper gears and bearings but what I'm wodering is if some guys are losing speed from the overall gearing and re-propping why not try going back to 15/19 lower gears once the warranty is up,Smitty
Smitty, from what I understand they couldn't get the 1.50's to hold up for any length of time and that it had something to do with harmonics or something like that. I think the upper gears in the BMax change the gear ratios slightly... It was explained to me in detail about 3 years ago but I don't remember exactly what it was.

I lost 2 mph when I made my switch... I blew two brand new IMCO Extreme SC's (800 hp rated in a 10k boat ) in about 20 hours on 715 HP.... Thus far I ran 100 hrs on the BMax with 715 hp the first year and 830 hp the second year..all ocean running.

I had one small issue with the coupler that connects the verticle shaft in the lower to the upper but I've had ZERO downtime since I bought these drives well over two seasons now.

With that being said....100 hrs on them I sent them back to Dean to be fresheshened so I can go another 100+ hours without batting an eye!
__________________
Geronimo!!~
Panther is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 03:57 PM   #30
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Alamo, Ca
Posts: 121
36 Spectre Cat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panther View Post
Smitty, from what I understand they couldn't get the 1.50's to hold up for any length of time and that it had something to do with harmonics or something like that. I think the upper gears in the BMax change the gear ratios slightly... It was explained to me in detail about 3 years ago but I don't remember exactly what it was.

I lost 2 mph when I made my switch... I blew two brand new IMCO Extreme SC's (800 hp rated in a 10k boat ) in about 20 hours on 715 HP.... Thus far I ran 100 hrs on the BMax with 715 hp the first year and 830 hp the second year..all ocean running.

I had one small issue with the coupler that connects the verticle shaft in the lower to the upper but I've had ZERO downtime since I bought these drives well over two seasons now.

With that being said....100 hrs on them I sent them back to Dean to be fresheshened so I can go another 100+ hours without batting an eye!
Thats awesome, I hope I have similar success!
bonecrusher is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IMCO sc vs max billet vs teague platnium vs B max soinc Drives and Lower Units 44 05-27-2009 10:20 AM
switching from a #5 to #6 stecz20 Drives and Lower Units 3 01-06-2008 01:26 PM
Switching Exhaust Tips Ryan8886 Do It Yourself, Boating on a Budget 1 12-10-2007 10:50 PM
Switching to Allstate Interceptor Insurance and Finance 6 01-15-2007 05:21 PM
Big Max Lil Max ONESICKGLADIATOR General Boating Discussion 35 03-03-2006 10:02 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.


Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0