Notices

Arneson or SCX

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-04-2009, 09:04 AM
  #21  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jassman
The Arnesons are the real deal...they work..and will handle way more power than any bravo drive. Ive been on 4 Arneson boats in which Ive driven 3..and owned one. Hands down my favorite. Simplistic in design, reduced drag, increased speeds, easy to work on, and in-expensive in comparison. Boating is suppose to be fun, why worry about breaking down.. Jeff
Exactly. There are enough things to worry about in performance boating. With Arnesons, you basically forget about the drives. They do not break. I have never heard of anyone breaking an Arneson. In fact, there are stories of a guy local to me that ran his big cat for a short period of time with no oil in the drives ( by mistake ) with no issues.
StephenA is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 12:23 PM
  #22  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Watkins Glen
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am comfortable with the Arnesons as far as durability and speed increase. My only reservation is how are they going to handle @ 110+ in a light single V bottom? Seems like I might be going into slightly uncharted territory....
DonRoc is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 06:44 AM
  #23  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,396
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DonRoc
I am comfortable with the Arnesons as far as durability and speed increase. My only reservation is how are they going to handle @ 110+ in a light single V bottom? Seems like I might be going into slightly uncharted territory....
Im still trying to get all the facts for you..
Jassman is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 08:23 PM
  #24  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Watkins Glen
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am hearing some people took off ther arnesons due to handling issues they could not resolve. Let me know when you get some facts on a smaller light V.
Jeff,
Thanks for lookig into it for me.
DonRoc is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 09:17 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DonRoc
I am hearing some people took off ther arnesons due to handling issues they could not resolve. Let me know when you get some facts on a smaller light V.
Jeff,
Thanks for lookig into it for me.
A friend of mine tried a arneson on a Bat 28 (Vector in the us) He was running ssm v before .but to many drives went fishing so he got fed up with the ssm v. However he tried so many things with the Arneson and LOT of different props ! And i can say he is not running it any more ! The boat was not fun to drive in high speeds ! It "overplaned" what ever he tried ! And he is a very experienced racedriver with like 30+ years of offshoreracing in sweden .I think your boat are to small for a Arneson-setup.
alfons is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 11:43 PM
  #26  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Watkins Glen
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am hearing that alot. but you are the first to post it. Thanks. The arneson sounds great on paper but the risk is too high. I really would love to give it a try. But so far not one person with a light single has come forward with a sucess story. I have all winter to decied but looks like it will be an SCX. Maybe by then they will have a -3 SCX
DonRoc is offline  
Old 10-08-2009, 11:42 AM
  #27  
Rik
arneson-industries.com
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Rik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alfons
A friend of mine tried a arneson on a Bat 28 (Vector in the us) He was running ssm v before .but to many drives went fishing so he got fed up with the ssm v. However he tried so many things with the Arneson and LOT of different props ! And i can say he is not running it any more ! The boat was not fun to drive in high speeds ! It "overplaned" what ever he tried ! And he is a very experienced racedriver with like 30+ years of offshoreracing in sweden .I think your boat are to small for a Arneson-setup.
Alfons, you have neglected to mention that when Christopher blew his Mercury he landed on the rocks damaging the bottom. Subsequent repairs did not put the bottom back to it's "Original" state as the boat does not perform with a Mercury either now as he has even put a standoff box on the #6 on a 28' boat and still needs bow lift. But you are right, it was all the Arnesons fault not the bottom repair.
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Rik is offline  
Old 10-08-2009, 01:02 PM
  #28  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,396
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DonRoc
I am hearing some people took off ther arnesons due to handling issues they could not resolve. Let me know when you get some facts on a smaller light V.
Jeff,
Thanks for lookig into it for me.

talked with a few people... besides Pat and Rik. boat was running 83mph with approx 620hp on a Ford motor. appr. 80 hours to date. No handling issues.. and three you tube videos out there that I could find. As to the weight, this 28 is a larger, deep all running surface 28' boat, she's also very stable and heavy. Good Luck. Jeff
Jassman is offline  
Old 10-09-2009, 03:23 AM
  #29  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rik
Alfons, you have neglected to mention that when Christopher blew his Mercury he landed on the rocks damaging the bottom. Subsequent repairs did not put the bottom back to it's "Original" state as the boat does not perform with a Mercury either now as he has even put a standoff box on the #6 on a 28' boat and still needs bow lift. But you are right, it was all the Arnesons fault not the bottom repair.
The damage to the hull wasnt that big ! I was there !! Dont get me wrong here Rik ! I think Arneson an other surface drives are great ! But with a small stephull like the Bat you have almost a fixed runningangle tru the water ! And therefore i think the Arn. lift the stern to much. The drive isnt the problem the boat is to short !! Now when Christer is driving with double ext. box The boat runs great in a straight line , But in turn it looks scaary ! The best drive for the bat is the volvo DPX-r Its like driving on tarmac with slicks ! sorry little oftopic there !
alfons is offline  
Old 10-09-2009, 03:27 AM
  #30  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DonRoc
I am hearing that alot. but you are the first to post it. Thanks. The arneson sounds great on paper but the risk is too high. I really would love to give it a try. But so far not one person with a light single has come forward with a sucess story. I have all winter to decied but looks like it will be an SCX. Maybe by then they will have a -3 SCX
How about this one !!! I wanna try !http://www.xpowerdrive.com/frame_index.html
alfons is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.