| OSO Sponsor |
 |
| OSO Sponsor |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
09-29-2009, 09:54 PM
|
#1
|
|
VIP Member
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Watkins Glen
Posts: 272
2005 Kryptonite 29
|
Arneson or SCX
I am doing some engine mods on my 2005 Kryptonite over the winter 1000hp plus. I am torn between upgrading my SC extreme upper for a SCX or going with an Arneson. Looks like the Arneson will cost me an additional 12K or so. I would hope for the 12K I would get better reliability and some more speed. Anyone do a Arneson on a smaller V hull? Mine is a 27 with a platform its called a 29.
Don
Glen Harbor Marina
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 10:40 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 735
Advantage 28ft Sport Cat w/ pair of 8's
|
1000HP.............. Arneson all the way.
Darrell.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 12:49 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 208
2006 Kryptonite 29'
|
I would personally go with Arneson, or maybe a dry sump #6 like the Slim Shady Activator.
Arneson would be a lot lighter and probably faster, but I havent seen a Kryptonite with that setup before, so it will be a big job to dial it in.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 08:49 AM
|
#4
|
|
228-216-0900
 Platinum Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Diamodhead, MS
Posts: 8,003
The legendary 38 PP with a tweeked bottom and a new deck
|
__________________
EPIC POWERYACHTS
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 06:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
VIP Member
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Watkins Glen
Posts: 272
2005 Kryptonite 29
|
I talked a litle with Rik. I just wonder how it will handle with the Arneson.
Phil, i should work up some prices on the #6 @ cost it may not be so bad. I would hate to go with the Arneson and then be stuck being a test pilot all summer trying to get it set up. I hear there might be fiberglass work to the bottom necessary and testing to get it dialed in. I wish I knew more about the Arneson.... expecially with a single engine smaller V..
|
|
|
10-01-2009, 01:14 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 208
2006 Kryptonite 29'
|
You will most likely have to fill in the notch in order to fit the Arneson.
There is a small Donzi that I just saw on here recently with a single arneson. A while back there was a bigger single vee, 28-30' range, that had an arneson, but the guy never responded back when people asked how it worked out.
I am not saying that the arneson is a bad idea, it will just take a TON of dialing in. Once you get it set up right, you will be in the money. As I am sure you know, surface props are a totally different ballgame, usually requiring a bunch of different test props. They do have a setup where you can use a standard Bravo style prop, which may not be a bad idea.
I say go for it with the Arneson, who knows, maybe Rik will work with you a little on the price considering you are going to a test dummy.
|
|
|
10-01-2009, 10:54 AM
|
#7
|
|
VIP Member
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Watkins Glen
Posts: 272
2005 Kryptonite 29
|
Phil,
Maybe I will call Rik today. I really want to get my propshaft higher. I think I am going to ditch the ITS and put the drive closer to the transom. That will get it higher in the water, same effect, or go with the Arneson.....
|
|
|
10-01-2009, 12:01 PM
|
#8
|
|
Nordic Thor 700efi
 Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dallas Ga
Posts: 702
2007 Nordic Thor 700 EFI SCX drive
|
I have a scx with no problem and know people running 1100 plus without failure to date. Be careful with the arneson to make sure a surface prop will work well with your hull. I have heard some people have setup problems when converting with x demension and proping correctly. I am not saying anything bad about the drive because they are really nice just do your reseach before you make your choice.
John
|
|
|
10-01-2009, 03:30 PM
|
#9
|
|
VIP Member
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Watkins Glen
Posts: 272
2005 Kryptonite 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlomant
I have a scx with no problem and know people running 1100 plus without failure to date. Be careful with the arneson to make sure a surface prop will work well with your hull. I have heard some people have setup problems when converting with x demension and proping correctly. I am not saying anything bad about the drive because they are really nice just do your reseach before you make your choice.
John
|
Thats my whole problem. Where to find the research.... I hear good from everyone using the Arnesons, and they are strong. Then I hear about setup... Somewhere the truth must lie, but where to find it out without spending 20K.
I talked to Rik today, he is confident it would be a good fit, and after talking with him and looking at the drawings am confident it will be a day job hooking it up. But then I will have to hope it handles good... Its an expensive leap of faith. But I do like to be different. Maybe Rik will loan me the drive and if it works I can give him the $$$, and if it does not I can send the drive back, lol
Guess I will finish the motor and then worry about the drive.
|
|
|
10-02-2009, 02:05 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 208
2006 Kryptonite 29'
|
Have you decided on a motor build yet?
It will certainly be a serious roll of the dice, but selling it if it doesnt work out shouldnt be too big of an issue. You may lose a little money on it, but you never know, it could work out great.
Are you planning on using Rik's Bravo conversion, or just getting a complete new setup and redoing the transom (again)?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
| |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.
|