Notices

1000hp drive

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-19-2010, 03:23 PM
  #31  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
omerta one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LOTO
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by campionchase910
this chart shows that the A6 is only good for 550hp
http://www.twindisc.com/Downloads/pd...n_specs_08.pdf
You can upgrade the gears in the A6...

HD Gear Upgrade for ASD6/1721 Drive Units:

Upgrade the power rating of your ASD6/1721 drive unit with our New HD gear upgrade.

Available in 1.32:1 and 1.56:1 ratio's, the gear up grade increases the power rating to over 750 lbs of torque.


There is also an A7

Look at the latest specs...
Attached Thumbnails 1000hp drive-drive_selection_page_1.jpg  

Last edited by omerta one; 11-19-2010 at 03:30 PM.
omerta one is offline  
Old 11-19-2010, 03:32 PM
  #32  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Posts: 477
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

thanks Omerta one but I will be runnig about 916.3 FTLBS of torque at 5400 rpms. I doubt it will last or will it?
campionchase910 is offline  
Old 11-19-2010, 03:36 PM
  #33  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
omerta one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LOTO
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by campionchase910
thanks Omerta one but I will be runnig about 916.3 FTLBS of torque at 5400 rpms. I doubt it will last or will it?
The A7 goes to 850; best ask Rik.
omerta one is offline  
Old 11-19-2010, 03:42 PM
  #34  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by campionchase910
thanks Omerta one but I will be runnig about 916.3 FTLBS of torque at 5400 rpms. I doubt it will last or will it?
Dam...if you were running 916.2 ft lbs, it would probably work...j/k

I would either tame down your motor build, or go with the Arneson. In the long run, it will be worth it. Baby'in that 1000HP mill aint no fun, and thats what you will have to do with a bravo style drive. Dont forget a beefy tranny too.

Im not sure, but i would think a wet sump #6 would rob more HP than the arneson, and probably be slower?
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 11-19-2010, 03:45 PM
  #35  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Posts: 477
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

your right mild thunder it will be no mercy
campionchase910 is offline  
Old 11-19-2010, 04:21 PM
  #36  
Rik
arneson-industries.com
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Rik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by campionchase910
thanks Omerta one but I will be runnig about 916.3 FTLBS of torque at 5400 rpms. I doubt it will last or will it?
We can change the gears out and it will handle the power.
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Rik is offline  
Old 11-19-2010, 09:26 PM
  #37  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Traverse City MI
Posts: 3,590
Received 278 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

If you want speed and rooster tail call Rik and order a new arneson, and be done with it! Very cool set up.

Want value call Dick "mr gadgets" and order a scx. Its the strongest so called "bravo style" out there but there isnt much "bravo" about it! I have personally seen his badass checkmate and very powerful engine fire up. If he trust a scx and builds drives then you should also!

If you want to realize how good those two options are you could price a x-power at $35,000!
offshorexcursion is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 10:22 AM
  #38  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oneida Lake NY
Posts: 3,641
Received 29 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

This looks like a deal! One to use one to sell

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NEW-t...item3a606d24e7
4bus is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 11:32 AM
  #39  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Casa De Kappy
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by campionchase910
thanks Omerta one but I will be runnig about 916.3 FTLBS of torque at 5400 rpms. I doubt it will last or will it?
Hello Campionchase910:

Well Mr. Gadgets started off in the right direction but you did not give us enough information on what your trying to do.

1. Is this a Bravo set-up boat...I assume it is but want to make sure.

2. It is single engine right.

3. V-Bottom or Cat.

You can run a SCX/SC drive on your boat they have a complete assembly in the classified section of this site. The SCX can handle your HP/Torque specs. easily.

I know as I have personal experience with this set-up and your type of ratings on the engine side of the equation. The SCX/SC combo is the best set-up versus a SCX/SCX combination. Why! well the full SCX drive scrubs waaaay to much speed on the top end.

Now the down side to the SCX/SC combo is that the weak link will be your lower i.e...the SC unit namely the gear sets. If you fly the boat or jack rabbit your starts your lower will not live. If you get past 4.5K RPM and roll into it... the drive will give you the speed your looking for and be reliable.

No one touched on this but the beauty also with this combination is your not bound by cleaver props. The cleavers in a single engine application will kill you in terms of cost. Why! because you need to find the right one to work on you boat and that is not easy or cheap. The SCX will allow you to run Bravo style props and they are far cheaper and more plentiful than cleaver props.

If you are already budget concious than the SCX is the way to go IMO in a single engine boat. Now if you change one fact i.e...your boat is a twin than I would save your duckets for a set of Arnesons.

KAP
P.S. If you do choose the surface drive send me a P.M. I have three single engine cleavers for sale. I have run both a surface drive and a Bravo and I am currently using a SCX/SC combo by choice not due to cost.
kap328 is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 01:50 PM
  #40  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bowling Green, Kentucky
Posts: 1,975
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

kap do you think if you had a twin cat and you ran a higher x dimension where you could get the SCX lower bullet out of the water it would perform efficiently? I would think that then you would have to use the 6 props to keep from breaking them. I think Nordic did one of their big cats with this set up. Haven't heard how it performed.
SkiDoc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.