Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
gear ratio 1.5 vs 1.3 >

gear ratio 1.5 vs 1.3

Notices

gear ratio 1.5 vs 1.3

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-17-2013, 12:33 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: shreveport, LA
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default gear ratio 1.5 vs 1.3

I have read mixed reviews on gear ratios. which would be better a 1.5 ratio spinning a 34 prop or a 1.3 ratio spinning a 30? with the slip factor the same prop calculator shows them being within 2 mph. 6000rpm 1.5 34 pitch .085slip 117.8 vs 6000 1.3 30 pitch .085 120mph. (8.5% slip is what I have right now with 30pitch and 1.5 gears) is a lower pitch more efficient30 to 34? AND is the 1.5 harder on the drive than running a 1.3ratio with a smaller prop? I have heard thru the grape vine that a 1.5 with a big prop (34) is harder on the drive and more likely to break the drive shafts and or gears. any thoughts? btw big power (1100hp+)
and I know that any bravo style drive is very likely to break at some point with that hp, just wondering if one is a better choice than the other.

Last edited by La/stryker; 12-17-2013 at 12:36 AM.
La/stryker is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 12:45 AM
  #2  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by La/stryker
I have read mixed reviews on gear ratios. which would be better a 1.5 ratio spinning a 34 prop or a 1.3 ratio spinning a 30? with the slip factor the same prop calculator shows them being within 2 mph. 6000rpm 1.5 34 pitch .085slip 117.8 vs 6000 1.3 30 pitch .085 120mph. (8.5% slip is what I have right now with 30pitch and 1.5 gears) is a lower pitch more efficient30 to 34? AND is the 1.5 harder on the drive than running a 1.3ratio with a smaller prop? I have heard thru the grape vine that a 1.5 with a big prop (34) is harder on the drive and more likely to break the drive shafts and or gears. any thoughts? btw big power (1100hp+)
and I know that any bravo style drive is very likely to break at some point with that hp, just wondering if one is a better choice than the other.
i like the 1.5 ,,it will get you from point a to point b quicker but 1100 hp.... yes the 1.3 would be stronger..you will also get more slip numbers with a 1.5,,brakes the prop loose easier..
FIXX is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 02:12 AM
  #3  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,556
Received 1,821 Likes on 907 Posts
Default

What drive has a 1.3??? You are about of prop on Bravo style drives at 34" and I would swap to a 1.35 for more options.
Griff is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 05:40 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With the 1.36 gear having less teeth then a 1.50 there is more strength. You got to find 1999-2000 desiel gears. These were the strongest gears produced. With 1100hp i would definitly choose the 1.36, after all with that kind of power your not going to b e able to take advantage of the torque a 1.50 gear offers unless you get sixs or arnesons.
BLUEMAGIC is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 01:49 PM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: shreveport, LA
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
What drive has a 1.3??? You are about of prop on Bravo style drives at 34" and I would swap to a 1.35 for more options.
A bmax does 1.3 and 1.5
Imco makes 1.35 and 1.5

Last edited by La/stryker; 12-17-2013 at 02:08 PM.
La/stryker is offline  
Old 12-18-2013, 09:34 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: catskill, ny
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im also in the same situation accept only 900hp but currently running a zx w/1.5 & a 34p @ 6000rpm with about 12% slip. Was told that Im not efficient with this set-up and need to go to a 1.36 ratio. Can someone explain to me about efficient ??
dave269 is offline  
Old 12-19-2013, 06:24 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the larger pitch props have a lot more slip then the smaller pitch props such as 28's or 29's. Back in the day before they came out with xr drives all the race boats ran bravo 1's with a 1.36 gear ratio. Having the power to turn a 34 pitch props puts a great amount of stress on the drive. Puts a huge amount torque threw the drive. Spinning a 1.36 gear allows to to spin a smaller wheel faster with less stress then spinning a large wheel slower. Also with a 1.36 gear you will notice a big difference in idle speed due to the fact your blade is spinning faster
BLUEMAGIC is offline  
Old 12-20-2013, 08:58 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run a 1.5 on my boat a 26 DCB Mach with a 32 bravo 1 and I can tell you it is a dog out of the hole, slips big time, tach will go to 35-3800 getting on plane and I need a 1:35 ratio also or a better prop. But in my mind weather you put a 34 on a 1.5 or a 32 on a 1:35 the stress on the upper would still be the same correct. Now if you went down to a 30 or smaller pitch on the 1:35 then I would say you are reducing the stress on the upper verses the 34 on a 1:5.
J.P. is offline  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:41 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

when running big hp in front of bravos its a good idea to try to do everything you can to keep it alive, every little bit helps. With more material on the 1.36 gear compared to the 1.50 along with the ability to spin a smaller wheel faster can only increase your chances of more boating hours.
BLUEMAGIC is offline  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:55 PM
  #10  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went from 1.5 to 1.36 last year. I was limited to 5600 rpm from cam and heads, was running out of prop. The 30P had poor characteristics, and the 32P brought the RPM down but wasn't any faster. Only way for more speed was to turn RPM higher which I couldn't, or gear down and re-prop.

Now I run a 1.36 and a 28, fastest combo yet. My boat didn't seem to like the bigger pitched props.

28' Nordic, 540/Vortech
launchpad475 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.