Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
Does anyone else have older CMI headers that have NOT leaked? >

Does anyone else have older CMI headers that have NOT leaked?

Notices
Formula

Does anyone else have older CMI headers that have NOT leaked?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-19-2014, 02:16 PM
  #21  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
VoodooRob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 1,993
Received 46 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HyFive578
Got a chance to look at the Hardin Hurricane 525 headers up close at the Miami show this week.. They look very well constructed. The outer tubes are bigger than the CMI's and the collector area is now coated with an anti-corrosion coating. Have no idea of they hold up better than the CMI's, but they looked pretty beefy.. Hopefully, it will be a long time before I need to think about this, but these are worth consideration.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]518927[/ATTACH]
Next year replacing my headers is going to be top of the list, so thank you for the photo.Can you 180 degree the photo?
VoodooRob is offline  
Old 02-19-2014, 02:44 PM
  #22  
Registered
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

[ATTACH=CONFIG]518937[/ATTACH]

Hopefully this worked.. iPad photos are sometimes flaky when they upload...
Attached Thumbnails Does anyone else have older CMI headers that have NOT leaked?-image.jpg  
HyFive578 is offline  
Old 02-19-2014, 02:56 PM
  #23  
Registered
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VoodooRob
Next year replacing my headers is going to be top of the list, so thank you for the photo.Can you 180 degree the photo?
Like I said, I REALLY hope I'm not thinking about this for a long time having three engines but if/when it happens, I would seriously consider these. The Hardin headers really looked solid. The outer tubes are larger than CMI's to have more water around the inner tubes. The guy at the booth told me that they also started coating the inside of the collector and that looked pretty good too. Wish there were more guys that had direct experience with these but I don't think they've been in existence that long. Definitely worth a look..
HyFive578 is offline  
Old 02-19-2014, 05:33 PM
  #24  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Clarence, NY
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2004 twin 525s with 370 freshwater only hrs., run 60 psi water pressure at WOT, no leaks. I have a theory that the higher operating pressure, same principle that a pressure cooker operates under (raising the pressure raises the boiling point), helps keep the water at the header flange from boiling which improves the heat transfer capability of the surrounding water. Airated/boiling water carries less heat away at the flange weld. Call me crazy...
bonesmalon is offline  
Old 02-19-2014, 06:28 PM
  #25  
Registered
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 5,825
Received 607 Likes on 275 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bonesmalon
2004 twin 525s with 370 freshwater only hrs., run 60 psi water pressure at WOT, no leaks. I have a theory that the higher operating pressure, same principle that a pressure cooker operates under (raising the pressure raises the boiling point), helps keep the water at the header flange from boiling which improves the heat transfer capability of the surrounding water. Airated/boiling water carries less heat away at the flange weld. Call me crazy...
Is that 60 psi raw water pressure? The Mercury 525 service manual says that the max is 43 psi. I try to keep it between 35-40 wot. I've modified the inlet on my Imco shorty to help keep me within specs without running a pop-off valve. Wouldn't 60 psi be enough to risk blowing a heat exchanger? My headers stay cool to the touch and I check them often. They still have the flow restricters and I am not taking them out as long as everything is working fine.
thirdchildhood is offline  
Old 02-19-2014, 07:57 PM
  #26  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Clarence, NY
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yup that's raw water pressure. I know everybody talks about 30 psi but after 10 yrs with zero issues I have no intentions of messing with the recipe
bonesmalon is offline  
Old 02-19-2014, 09:23 PM
  #27  
Registered
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 5,825
Received 607 Likes on 275 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bonesmalon
Yup that's raw water pressure. I know everybody talks about 30 psi but after 10 yrs with zero issues I have no intentions of messing with the recipe
Yeah, people rip on me for letting it go over 40. I had put in a relief valve but 25 psi is not enough. Brownie (yup, Brownie) told me to lose the relief valve because it could stick open at a bad time. Good to know that the various heat exchangers can handle 60 psi!
thirdchildhood is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.