Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
35 vs 38 lightning's >

35 vs 38 lightning's

Notices

35 vs 38 lightning's

Old 11-07-2005, 08:15 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
itilldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hopkinsville, Ky
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 35 vs 38 lightning's

All right you knowledgeable people. I know I have aske d this before and I have to ask it again. The wife and I bought a 29 fever this year and already I want a bigger boat. Problem is I'm not sure what actually to get. Please pass on your thoughts:
1- Is the ride of a 38 worth the extra efforts compared to a 35 (efforts are in trailing, docking, cleaning, etc")? Both boats will at least have 500 EFI's and overall speed is not the most important thing. I would say ride is the ultimate thing we are wanting. We went to the LCR PR this year in our boat and we were getting beat up and I'm not sure if a 35 would have fared any better but I do believe a 38 min would have been the ticket for that weekend but is a 38 ft woth the toruble only for 2-4 PR's a year? We will be doing a few PR's in it; Ky Lake, Cumberland Lake and hopefully at least one a year around the country (SOW, CBPR, Ohio River, Lake Havasu, etc). We boat mostly on Ky Lake / Barkely Lake and it is realtivity smooth waters.

I just can not make my mind up on what to do.. I saw a 35 at P-57 that I really liked but they sold it about a week ago

Any and all comments will be appreciated.

PS
overall cost of boat is not a concern
itilldo is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 08:43 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Downtown42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 1 Flu Ovr KuKos Nest-WI
Posts: 9,950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

Originally Posted by itilldo
I would say ride is the ultimate thing we are wanting.

Then go 38, 42 if money is no prob.
Downtown42 is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 08:46 PM
  #3  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
dykstra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, IL
Posts: 6,003
Received 249 Likes on 136 Posts
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

Originally Posted by Downtown42
Then go 38, 42 if money is no prob.


What he said!
dykstra is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 10:34 PM
  #4  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Fountainclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

The half staggered engines make the 38 the way to go. Unless you need the space to store the bimini top like the 35 offers. Trailering and docking can be a pain but if it was easy, anyone could do it.

I too had a 29 before the 38.

F
Fountainclimber is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 04:45 AM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
itilldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hopkinsville, Ky
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

Fountainclimber,

Did you go from a 29 straight to a 38?
itilldo is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 07:41 AM
  #6  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Fountainclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

Yes,

Couldn't afford that two (or three) foot itis. But I wouldn't mind moving up to a 42.

We were trailer boaters and kept the 29 in the driveway. We started boating on Lake Michigan and half the time it was too rough for the 29. When the waves come over the bow, it's too rough.

I keep the 38 at the marina and just trailer it a few times a year. The down side is that gas is more expensive and I can't go and tinker any time I want but it is so much easier to drive to the marina and hop in.

I think the 35 is a sharp boat but every little bit helps on the Big Pond (except for docking). I have been in 35's, 38's and 42's. The front end seems to get heavier as you go up, especially compared to the 29. Of course the ride in rough water gets better.

I am sure you'll enjoy either one!

F
Fountainclimber is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 09:54 AM
  #7  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Indianapolis, Lake Cumberland
Posts: 3,902
Received 339 Likes on 118 Posts
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

No question, the ride in the 38 is way better. Especially if you are doing Poker Runs.
Marginmn is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 08:46 PM
  #8  
Charter Member # 545
Gold Member
 
Beak Boater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Port Tobacco MD/Cape Coral Fl
Posts: 2,152
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

Owned a 2002 35 Lightning, and currently own a 2006 38 Lightning. Either one will ride better than your 29. To me the 38 drives like a 35, dont really notice the difference between the boats from the drivers seat. I think the 38 with staggered motors is a better balanced boat. The 38 also has the edge in rough water. Docking trailering, docking, if you can do it with a 35, you can do it better in a 38. You really dont notice the extra 3 feet until you get into rough water. With 525's the 35 is running high 80's low 90's. The 38 is running close in the high 80's, just takes a little longer to get their. If I boated on the Great Lakes, I would be looking 38 or 42. The 42 is the ulitimate wave crusher. I have heard the 42 is hard on Bravo drives, dont know from first hand experience, maybe someone else will chime in about that.

good luck with whatever you get!!!
Beak Boater is offline  
Old 11-11-2005, 06:40 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
aTX427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

The 38 is a great balance between speed, size and stability on a big lake. With a side by side config, the 35 will walk the 38 hands down, but the 38 stag is faster than both the 35 and the 42. The cabin seems much bigger than the 35 and the same as the 42. But,personally I would prefer the 42 only because I can lay out on the sun pad without my feet hanging over.
aTX427 is offline  
Old 11-11-2005, 09:38 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Jonas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Puerto Vallarta Mx, Lake tahoe Ca,
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

to me it was 35 no brainer// it s fast, accelerates, with some power stuffed in the stern u can run it pretty glued in and not get pounded,, running xr drives weight is a factor, with going 38 and 42,
i have not been beat by any 38 on a p run rough or not. the 42 diff animal,, a 42 with 6;s and 1000 + per side staggered that would be the obvious choice but i didnt want to tie myself into a boat loan, especially in the 250k+ range...
the 35 is a whole lot diff than a 29
the 38 staggered is awsome but need some snorting 575's whippled etc to get it rolling, get something fast so u wont start messing with it in a yr as u get bored trying to push the throttles thru the dash//
pull up the thread maverick had going on his 38,, i saw the boat at KW last yr sweet 38 with power like mine,, seemed it drove him up a wall trying to get it to break 100.
I must just say could not have been happier with my boat,..
2002 35 that rocks...
you need some of these in the boat 700 hp 575's turn key idles nice starts easy, hauls tail for a v bottom
Attached Thumbnails 35 vs 38 lightning's-scope-2004-0152-800-small-.jpg   35 vs 38 lightning's-fountain-2002-fpb-closeup-engine-2.jpg  
Jonas is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.