Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
107 mph 35' Lightning w/staggered 525's >

107 mph 35' Lightning w/staggered 525's

Notices

107 mph 35' Lightning w/staggered 525's

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-03-2007, 07:23 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
racinfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are you sure they were Latham boxes and not ITS boxes from Mercury? And if so, why the change from ITS?
racinfever is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 01:49 AM
  #22  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oshvegas WI
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FeverMike
WOW...that is awesome....perfectly tunned!

think about it...back in 2000 the F2 35 race boats with HP500efi's (no cockpit or cabin race layup) would run 86-88 or so. Add 25 hp per engine, staggered set up, nice props and tune it all and these pleasure boats are running 100+mph!
no doubt the staggered 35 is a great runing boat, but every 525efi that comes out of merc racing dynos around 540-545 HP........that helps
JUKED YOU is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:12 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
1298FOUNTAIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LONG ISLAND NY
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Perfect set up with the staggered set up 525'S
1298FOUNTAIN is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:55 PM
  #24  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chesterfield, VA
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by racinfever
Are you sure they were Latham boxes and not ITS boxes from Mercury? And if so, why the change from ITS?
We didn't have any input on what was to be used on this boat. We knew it was an experimental set up that was expected to run at least 103 mph. The fact that it actually ran 107 mph speaks for itself. Apparently the decisions that were made at Fountain were right on. We are not sure why Latham boxes were used versus Mercury's ITS. It could be more control with the outside steering rams, less weight, less cost or who the heck knows. We do know, without a doubt, Latham boxes were used. We even asked about using 12" set back instead of the current 7". We were told that you would not be able to trim the drives out due to hitting the swim platform. Even with the 7" set back you are limited on how far you can trim the drives out. However, this boat does not require as much trim as most Fountains that we have driven. Top speed is achieved between 3 & 3/4 to just under 4 on the trim indicator. The nuetral trim point on this boat, as with most all Fountains, is 3.
convincor253 is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 01:10 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

(I bounce all over this website just to ask stupid questions.)

Do manufacturers stagger engines to move more weight toward the bow OR do they do it to move the outdrives closer to the bottom of the "V"? Or both? Or something else altogether?

I have noticed that staggered Lightnings seem faster than the side-by-sides......
towhead is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 05:11 PM
  #26  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chesterfield, VA
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FASTTIMES
daum! that baby is dialed in, there must be allot of time and testing involved to get those #'s out of a full pleasure boat. Post some pics
We have pics and we even have a video. If someone can tell us how to post them we will give it a try.
convincor253 is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 05:39 PM
  #27  
Racer
Racer
 
louietherigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: L.I. N.Y. Boca Fla.
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by towhead
(I bounce all over this website just to ask stupid questions.)

Do manufacturers stagger engines to move more weight toward the bow OR do they do it to move the outdrives closer to the bottom of the "V"? Or both? Or something else altogether?

I have noticed that staggered Lightnings seem faster than the side-by-sides......
Answer is yes to both, the staggered set up is the way to go.
louietherigger is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 07:07 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought you got more speed by raising the X-Dimension meaning raising the dirves out of the water to get less drag?
FROGMAN524 is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 01:00 AM
  #29  
Registered
 
Rebel_Heart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LOTO
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Raising the x-dim normally increases speed, depending on how high it was before. And, how you prop. I have seen the staggered boats are faster that the side by sides. I think the 35 lightning is actually heavier than the 35 executioneer, but is a faster boat.
Rebel_Heart is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 09:07 AM
  #30  
Registered
 
Reggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Liberty Iowa, 7 MM LOTO
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

staggered is usually faster, drives are closer together, less drag, weight is more centered.
Side by side, sometimes gives you more cockpit room, it's a trade off.
Reggie is offline  


Quick Reply: 107 mph 35' Lightning w/staggered 525's


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.