Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
Scx lowers >

Scx lowers

Notices

Scx lowers

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-02-2013, 06:23 PM
  #1  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Erie Ontario Canada
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Scx lowers

Has anyone put scx lowers on a 100 mph+ boat? I would like to know how much it slowed you down?I have heard as much as 10mph on a full stager 38, I find that hard to believe.

Thanks Joe
JMPH is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 07:11 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Greenville, North Carolina
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Its not quite that much but it definitely slows it down.
Reggie Fountain is offline  
Old 02-03-2013, 07:34 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: minnesota
Posts: 1,563
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

-4 s or regular SCXs , TRLs seems to drag those standard SCXs through the water pretty well even tho they have been Wilsonized , Eddie has been massaging my -4s quite a bit , still in the trial period yet .
575cat is offline  
Old 02-03-2013, 07:42 AM
  #4  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Erie Ontario Canada
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 575cat
-4 s or regular SCXs , TRLs seems to drag those standard SCXs through the water pretty well even tho they have been Wilsonized , Eddie has been massaging my -4s quite a bit , still in the trial period yet .
Regular scx with no massaging done.
JMPH is offline  
Old 02-03-2013, 08:48 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: minnesota
Posts: 1,563
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think allot depends on propshaft height , drive spacing , props , those skags on those lowers are very blunt and very long , and thick , they definitely need work to make them run cleaner .
575cat is offline  
Old 02-03-2013, 12:12 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TRL
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

TRL lost about 10mph if I remember right. He was on XR uppers and IMCO -2's. He either lost a drive or blew up an engine every time out as well....LOL
keegan is offline  
Old 02-05-2013, 08:51 PM
  #7  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Erie Ontario Canada
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Has anyone tried the new style scx lower -2 ?
JMPH is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 08:27 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
TRL505's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by keegan
TRL lost about 10mph if I remember right. He was on XR uppers and IMCO -2's. He either lost a drive or blew up an engine every time out as well....LOL
Correct.....10+mph loss over SC lowers. They have their place....but they slow you down...trust me. It was only after Wilson did their thing, and FPM did their thing, and YPM did his thing, and the bank did their thing, and my credit did its thing, and the insurmountable debt did its thing...... that we got back close to what the boat should run.

TRL505 is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 12:26 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRL505
Correct.....10+mph loss over SC lowers. They have their place....but they slow you down...trust me. It was only after Wilson did their thing, and FPM did their thing, and YPM did his thing, and the bank did their thing, and my credit did its thing, and the insurmountable debt did its thing...... that we got back close to what the boat should run.

Soo what your saying is for how much $$$ you have sunk into your 42 you could probably have a 42 lightning w/ 700+'s and 6's.
breakitout is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 01:54 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
TRL505's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by breakitout
Soo what your saying is for how much $$$ you have sunk into your 42 you could probably have a 42 lightning w/ 700+'s and 6's.
No...I am saying I could have a 42' Lightning with 1350's and 8's.
TRL505 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.