Notices
View Poll Results: 1997 2.5 offshores or 300x's
2.5's
20
27.40%
300 X's
53
72.60%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-13-2005, 07:19 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
berns29scarab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 7,141
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

If looking at a 30 spectre which would you prefer and why ? 1997 Merc 2.5 Offshores with new powerheads, and sportsmaster lowers, or 2003 300x's.
berns29scarab is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:44 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
paradigm shift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

Hard to argue with PowerBoat test with the 300's. Turn key pretty sweet if you ask me. I know nothing but if I had the choice that would be mine.
paradigm shift is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:46 PM
  #3  
JC
Registered
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Monroe, WI
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

300x's , no mixing of oil... Will also run 98 to 104 depending on conditions and load....( true GPS )
JC is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 08:02 PM
  #4  
Racer
Racer
 
Ryan Beckley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 5,143
Received 31 Likes on 19 Posts
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

97's are the old style motor "260" not even a comparison. No alternator lots of dead batteries. It would be a different story if you were talking about 280 2.5's with the alternators and mororola system.
Ryan Beckley is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 08:21 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
X-Rated30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Monroe, LA
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

No question, 300x's. Newer motor, fewer problems.
X-Rated30 is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 10:04 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
eMotiondriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rosedale,MD
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

Had Both almost, 99 ProMax and 99 2.5's. Boat rode flater with 2.5's but the Promax's used less fuel and only 5 mph slower. 20-20 hind site I should have stuck with the ProMax. IMO.
eMotiondriver is offline  
Old 04-14-2005, 07:09 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vice City & Tavernier, FL
Posts: 5,900
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

If Ya Want Turn Key Go With The 300's But Those 2.5 Are Badd Ass But High Maintenance But Are High In Rpm With Some Twisting. My 2 Cents 300's

Donz Jr Mike
thedonz is offline  
Old 04-14-2005, 08:11 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
dkwestern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lake St. Clair
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

300x Bad AZZ
dkwestern is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 08:00 PM
  #9  
GLH
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
GLH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 15,272
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

cowisl just changed 2.5's to 300's on his rig...
Those 2.5's have a narrow rpm band to have fun with if I recall.
GLH is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 09:23 AM
  #10  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
cowisl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Coast
Posts: 2,968
Received 36 Likes on 28 Posts
Default Re: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's

300 x's. More civil.
cowisl is offline  


Quick Reply: 2.5 offshore's vs 300x's


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.