New World speed records Super Cat & Super V
#21
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: long island, newyork
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: New World speed records Super Cat & Super V
Originally Posted by License To Thrill
i'm gonna have to see the GPS recall before I'll believe 160 with just 1000hp. I mean where are you gonna pick up 33+mph without a helluva lot more HP than that???
#23
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: long island, newyork
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: New World speed records Super Cat & Super V
Originally Posted by TRICK
Superboat: Team CRC, with driver Mike DeFrees, Vancouver, WA and Throttleman Jeff Harris, Greenville, NC set a new kilo record at a speed of 160.986MPH. Type of boat: 39' MTI with 2-525HP Mercury engines.
WOW!!!
WOW!!!
#24
Enjoy the show
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Joisey Shore
Posts: 10,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: New World speed records Super Cat & Super V
And I thought F1 boats had 496 engines this year? The old F1 record was in the high 80s or 90s. I think these are both misprints.
CRC - 750s
Instigator - 900s with duct tape
F1 Velocity - 496
CRC - 750s
Instigator - 900s with duct tape
F1 Velocity - 496
#25
Masher touches my
Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: New World speed records Super Cat & Super V
Originally Posted by JC performance engine
8275 with 538 HP to be exact
Stecz said it's still punk ass.............
#28
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The South -Prairieville @ New Orleans
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: New World speed records Super Cat & Super V
I think Bob Bull holds scl/superboat limited record. Does anyone know the speed? I think it is in the 127 mph range. Does anyone know if this class had any participants this year?
Last edited by Popeyes; 08-06-2005 at 06:14 AM. Reason: mistake
#29
Registered
Re: New World speed records Super Cat & Super V
Unfortunately, the number of entries was much lower than expected - this due to questions over whether the kilos would be recognized by UIM. That's all I was told.