I'm impressed - finally someone asking for my opinion on something........glad to see my words are finally sinking in.What does tee4texas think of this???
Panther - Well, I probably dont understand it well enough and havent researchd it enough to legitimately comment but I would have to say that if twinverados comments are correct, I would say its a bad interpretation of what must really be the story........same as MikeFever - surely there is more to the story than whats in that article. Think about it - all navigable waters off limits? Surely you jest.
Judges for the most part just interpret law and the way many of our state and fed laws are written and conflict, there are often many interpretations of the same law......similar to the Bible in many aspects - take a stand on something and you can find something somewhere to support it - likewise, many judges stay on the bench well after their prime and only after a few outlandish rulings do they get put into a position where they cant have much impact. I would like to see the legal basis (statutes, etc.) that the judge is using to make that determination - then it might be clearer as to how he arrived at this answer.
Panther - BuBoy - now that I gave my opinion, what do you think of this ruling - is it reasonable - any chance this could be correct - any chance this could be legislated?