NXT Drive Problems ?
#31
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Idaho, Arizona
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went with the Merc 700 NXT Drive package and all I can say is 'awesome'. The mid-range is incredible. I can't wait for PB to test a west coast cat (DCB or Eliminator) with this package. I think people will be suprised by the numbers (if that is important or not). To some it is and to some it isn't. I own a DCB F32. The boat has run 134. I have talked to mercury and what is being said on this thread is true - some Fountains had a handling issue due to the high X. I will never go back to a bravo drive after running this package.
#32
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting on the power loss. I have found that the Imor actually does not lose any power at 100+degrees vs. the Merc. Maybe you had another issue. Did you contact Imor to resolve your problem? At idle I considered it great. Planning was a different sound alltogether though. I found that from ilde to full throttle the powerband to be unreal. It was nearly veritical throughout and also showed this on the dyno sheets.
Just curious, could you have had another problem?
Just curious, could you have had another problem?
#33
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went with the Merc 700 NXT Drive package and all I can say is 'awesome'. The mid-range is incredible. I can't wait for PB to test a west coast cat (DCB or Eliminator) with this package. I think people will be suprised by the numbers (if that is important or not). To some it is and to some it isn't. I own a DCB F32. The boat has run 134. I have talked to mercury and what is being said on this thread is true - some Fountains had a handling issue due to the high X. I will never go back to a bravo drive after running this package.
#34
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Idaho, Arizona
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes. Those are the props I ended up with. You will be happy with the package. Are you doing a light layup and when will it be done?
#35
Registered
I went with the Merc 700 NXT Drive package and all I can say is 'awesome'. The mid-range is incredible. I can't wait for PB to test a west coast cat (DCB or Eliminator) with this package. I think people will be suprised by the numbers (if that is important or not). To some it is and to some it isn't. I own a DCB F32. The boat has run 134. I have talked to mercury and what is being said on this thread is true - some Fountains had a handling issue due to the high X. I will never go back to a bravo drive after running this package.
#36
Registered
Between 6 Illmors takin a s*** at Desert Storm and other issues I'm not a fan, in regards to the power loss @ high temps its a well known fact in the Lake Havasu area that from july thru aug you better re-prop and I personally lost 7mph, I called Illmor and I basically was told it was normal in our extreme temps 115 to 120 is the norm, I did a side by side comparison on 2 exact boats, 1 with an Illmor package and 1 with a 600 merc, the only advantage performance wise was rpm potential on the Illmor setup 6000 rpm/limiter versus 5375-5400 rpm on the merc 600, the merc had a much better midrange hit and I,m expecting my new 700's will clean up on the Illmor 700's in the same hull, fully bagged,carbon fiber/ kevlar layup in a 32 cat,,, IMHO
Do you know if the boat with the 600s had more consistent power when the advanced temps (110+) arrived in the summer?
#37
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 600s (and 700s) computer is supposed to compensate the boost to conditions to always produce the same power. I have not been in enough hugely different temps (like 110+) to be able to know for sure on my 600s. But they do seem to be much less reactive to changing conditions than previous engines I've owned, and therefore more consistent in varying conditions.
Do you know if the boat with the 600s had more consistent power when the advanced temps (110+) arrived in the summer?
Do you know if the boat with the 600s had more consistent power when the advanced temps (110+) arrived in the summer?
#38
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bagged,light lay-up, poker run interior etc,etc,etc, you know the drill !!! It might be done for Desert Storm ? My buddy Ralph is doing his at the same time with 1100 Teagues/Quads/#6's 80 to 130 mph at warp10 He's propping it like Jensons boat ,,,all acceleration I was in your boat with 6 blade Herrings,how do the Merc 38's compare?
#39
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
#40
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know that the horsepower loss thru the #6 is slightly more than a Bravo and the NXT-1 is less than the Bravo. The Imco 1000 drive is horrible thats why there arent many out there so I'm told, The XR/IMCO Extreme VS The Konrad is an unknown to me with comparable power, the only West Coat boats that I know that are using them are a Skater 30 flatdeck with 700 Illmors and a 38 Eliminator with Med/Big power that Ive seen in Tahoe and Havasu