Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
CMI headers vs. Stainless Marine Gen III >

CMI headers vs. Stainless Marine Gen III

Notices

CMI headers vs. Stainless Marine Gen III

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-26-2002, 03:01 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question CMI headers vs. Stainless Marine Gen III

Fellas,
I read the pro's and con's of headers vs. manifolds, each has it's benefits and drawbacks.

I'm in process of installing a 509ci BBC with radical roller cam and 10:1 compression. With that said, I could use the cylinder scavenging benefits of a full 32" runner. Stainless Marine makes a (in my opinion) a bullet proof Gen. III manifold, riser and stainless tail pipe, however the 15" runner scares me. Is it worth spending a little extra $$ for CMI's 32" runner header? (and yes, I know the headers look kick a$$ and probably sound a little better)

My friend has the GEN III's on his Falcon, and they have worked flawlessly.

Oh yeah, the boat is a 1971 Donzi GT (looks like a Classic, but is beamier) and will utilize Arneson's extension box and #6 drive in salt water.
ASD-6 is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 03:05 PM
  #2  
Charter Member #319
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pennsville NJ.
Posts: 3,979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you have the $$$$$ go with the CMI. Just got them on my boat. They do look KICK ASS !!!!!!!!
bajabob38 is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 03:13 PM
  #3  
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Dean Ferry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Is. Fl. USA
Posts: 7,212
Received 393 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Looks aside, The KE Manifold/header is by far the best HEADER, (Full 32" runners) and is manifold TOUGH, (No leaks!) on the market. I have run my set on my HP500 for 4+ years in the Atlantic ocean and have no problems. Plus, I don't have the H2O reversion problem either with my KE's! The only down side is they are not the eye-candy that some people perfer, and they are alittle loud! I put Shotgun III's mufflers on them also, again, with no problems.
Hope this helps,
MD
Dean Ferry is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 03:19 PM
  #4  
Scott72
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't vouch for Stainless Marine, but I will say that CMI has been nothing but helpful in setting up my exhaust. Got the wrong tailpipes (my fault), no problem, had custom ones made in a week and 1/2 - a perfect fit. I couldn't measure from the outside of the boat for custom tailpipes (Formula with Silent thunder platform), so they helped me figure out dimensions from the inside. Tore a header gasket adjusting rockers, no problem, overnighted me a new pair. They've been great.

Just my experiance.

Scott
 
Old 06-26-2002, 07:22 PM
  #5  
Charter/Platinum Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Egg Harbor Twp, N.J. USA
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tried both types on my naturally aspirated full roller, 10:1 compression, 588inch tall deck. The Gen III pulled 5 more HP above 5,000. The CMI's are prettier, but the Gen III's work, besides, Iam starting my 4th boating season, and they still look brand new.
blueamerican is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 08:16 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
jollyroger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lake Winni, NH
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nate...

Do the rest of your Donzi brothers know what you are up to?? Good thing I'm putting a 'Hawk on mine. I'll need to just to keep up!!

Woodsy
jollyroger is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 08:28 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
36spectre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Princeton, new jersey
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

CMI all the way. I bought a set with the "cool collars" and they perform flawlessly. Also I found out a trick that makes them last years longer in salt water apps. On the runner, remove the rear cap and replace them with an adapter and a 1/4 inch hose. Run the hose out of the hull just above the water line thus allowing them to drain automatically after each use. I also think the CMI's have a lifetime time warrenty. Otto
36spectre is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 09:30 PM
  #8  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,396
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Pat at Active Thunder is putting CMI on my KE675's, I have them also on my Sonic, never have had a problem, 88 hours and no leaks.
Jassman is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 10:14 PM
  #9  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,396
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Troutly, You can see your reflection in them, eye candy it is.
Jassman is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 07:17 AM
  #10  
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Dean Ferry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Is. Fl. USA
Posts: 7,212
Received 393 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Troutly,
I'm just an "Enginerd" by trade/schooling, therefore I make most of buying decisions based on performance/reliability data, (Enginerd's curse!), just like @ work! It's funny, when I look @ KE's headers, I see a BEAUTIFUL example of ENGINEERING/DESIGN and reliability, but, hey thats' the curse I mentioned earlier.
I would like my next set(s)? of KE headers to be coated the Mercury Racing Blue, if he can do that? I wonder if KE will polish them, that would improve the "Eye Candy factor"? Hmmmm?
MD
Dean Ferry is offline  


Quick Reply: CMI headers vs. Stainless Marine Gen III


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.