Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Cat Insurance Situation Has Gone Beyond Ridiculous! >

Cat Insurance Situation Has Gone Beyond Ridiculous!

Notices

Cat Insurance Situation Has Gone Beyond Ridiculous!

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-02-2007, 01:47 PM
  #31  
T2x
Allergic to Nonsense
Platinum Member
 
T2x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Granite Quarry, NC
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom A.
Good point Chris!
However, there is a problem here. Twice I was ready to make a move on a 36 Spectre w/ mild power and have yet to be approved for an insurance request.
Did you try Markel?
T2x is offline  
Old 07-02-2007, 06:04 PM
  #32  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 1,495
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tantrum
Originally Posted by Chuck
There is a new player already doing business. I don't think they will write a no cat exp. policy , but they are much more competitive than Markel. Call Bob Luellan at Worldwide Marine Group.
This is the call to make. This is the call to make.
Stop listening to V bottom owners that "heard stuff" and listen to cat owners who have legit insurance.
These cat insurance posts are getting as bad as the step bottom spin outs and the apache threads.
Actually Chuck was exactly right. I spoke to Bob Luellan at Worldwide Marine Group. Very nice person, but said needed cat experience before he could help.

I also spoke to John at Total Dollar Insurance, a Markel rep, and he said Markel has horsepower limits that they will insure, twin 575's for 32', twin 700's for 36'. Over that it is considered "over powered". He also said for similar sized boats, similar value, and similar top speeds, the cat insurance is approximately three times more expensive than a V. He cited a higher incident rate, and higher loss levels per incident for cats vs. V's. As an example, I asked about two boats both worth $100K and capable of 110 mph. The V "ballpark" (don't hold him to it) was $1800, while the Cat was $4.5K to $5K.

Also their policies state that if alcohol is found to be involved, the claim will automatically be denied. He mentioned that one of his customers doesn't allow drinking by ANYONE on the boat until the boat ride is over, in case he needs that person to be an eyewitness or help out after a crash.

Michael

Last edited by Michael1; 07-02-2007 at 06:18 PM.
Michael1 is offline  
Old 07-03-2007, 09:52 PM
  #33  
Registered
 
Cattitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK, Grand, Beaver, LOTO
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you buy a lower power cat the insurance can be decent if you keep the policy value (and therefore loan value) low enough. My 496HO cat costs about 100 more than my 28 Pantera, both reasonable.

That said, you have to be willing to live with the decent cruise and top end but less than spine tingling accleration- but I'd rather be in the cat I have than wishing I could afford the bigger/faster cat and living with the V

Then again, my Pantera will wax the Daytona up to 70 mph
Cattitude is offline  
Old 07-03-2007, 10:07 PM
  #34  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
insurance

whose not listening i'll post the # to international water foundation assoc. that is a great co. to insure cat's
rfurr is offline  
Old 07-03-2007, 10:14 PM
  #35  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
insurance

this goes out to the guy that was looking at the 32 skater , what a deal. who ever you decide to use you cannot tell the
insurance co. that the cat will run over a 100mph no matter how much experience you have, this coming from a guy that has had 5 cat's. if you want somthing you can get insurance on. i've got a 30 spectre i'll sell you. post your # and i'll call you
rfurr is offline  
Old 07-03-2007, 11:22 PM
  #36  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok, why is the insurance so hard to get and so much more expensive for cats than v's?
FROGMAN524 is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 05:32 AM
  #37  
Charter Member # 545
Gold Member
 
Beak Boater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Port Tobacco MD/Cape Coral Fl
Posts: 2,152
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FROGMAN524
ok, why is the insurance so hard to get and so much more expensive for cats than v's?
also spoke to John at Total Dollar Insurance, a Markel rep, and he said Markel has horsepower limits that they will insure, twin 575's for 32', twin 700's for 36'. Over that it is considered "over powered". He also said for similar sized boats, similar value, and similar top speeds, the cat insurance is approximately three times more expensive than a V. He cited a higher incident rate, and higher loss levels per incident for cats vs. V's. As an example, I asked about two boats both worth $100K and capable of 110 mph. The V "ballpark" (don't hold him to it) was $1800, while the Cat was $4.5K to $5K.

Also their policies state that if alcohol is found to be involved, the claim will automatically be denied. He mentioned that one of his customers doesn't allow drinking by ANYONE on the boat until the boat ride is over, in case he needs that person to be an eyewitness or help out after a crash.
Beak Boater is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 09:44 AM
  #38  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cattitude
If you buy a lower power cat the insurance can be decent if you keep the policy value (and therefore loan value) low enough. My 496HO cat costs about 100 more than my 28 Pantera, both reasonable.

That said, you have to be willing to live with the decent cruise and top end but less than spine tingling accleration- but I'd rather be in the cat I have than wishing I could afford the bigger/faster cat and living with the V

Then again, my Pantera will wax the Daytona up to 70 mph
v's suck i had a 29 fever for six months what a lesson
rfurr is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 11:43 PM
  #39  
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
rbtnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Central, Ohio USA
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

World Wide has a least two companies that will write policies for cats. American Reliable is one of them.

I had two agents quote me prices from American Reliable and I would not agree to the value they put on my boat and they said it would go 10 - 15 mph faster than what I was stating.

My next step is to find the break points on HP and speed and maybe repower to get lower rates.
__________________
www.mtboats.com - Pages of boat related links
rbtnt is offline  
Old 07-09-2007, 03:14 PM
  #40  
Registered
 
Turbojack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Beak Boater;2186921]He also said for similar sized boats, similar value, and similar top speeds, the cat insurance is approximately three times more expensive than a V. He cited a higher incident rate, and higher loss levels per incident for cats vs. V's. As an example, I asked about two boats both worth $100K and capable of 110 mph. The V "ballpark" (don't hold him to it) was $1800, while the Cat was $4.5K to $5K.
QUOTE]


Does anyone remember more Cat incidents then V incidents? I think OSO does a good job of reporting on all boat accidents. I can remember a few cat accidents but I remember way more V accidents then cats. The more V accidents may because there are way more V's.
Turbojack is offline  


Quick Reply: Cat Insurance Situation Has Gone Beyond Ridiculous!


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.