Originally Posted by jafo

That's a beautiful boat and would be a blast to own. However, present insurance prices on that piece of machinery is almost cost prohibitive for most folks. I could insure a Cessna Turbo 206 on amphibious floats for less $$$ (and it's faster and a lot more useful).
It's not easy to stomach insurance on a seasonal piece of recreational equipment like a cat when that alone costs you $10/day or more. I'd agree with a previous post- the outboards are a more attractive route with that boat.

Originally Posted by Michael1

The insurance company tables were coming up with 135. That boat would satisfy just about anybody for speed.

Michael

Originally Posted by Cat man do

Want To Buy It, This Time Of The Year Is Bad To Buy Anything For Me. Great Deal Tho 100 Plus Mph Without Spending 200k. Some One Will Be Real Happy

Originally Posted by marylandmark

Michael1-

How does that work?

Can the general public look at the tables? Just curious how they come up with the numbers is all...

Originally Posted by glassdave

How would that boat handle with that set up? I have a friend that has a 33 foot cat with the exact same set up and it is one ill handling mo-fo. thats a lot of weight out back to try and balance on a boat that size. does look like a nice piece for the $$$ though.

Originally Posted by Nauti Kitty

This boat handles awesome. Incredible excelleration and very stable at 130 NK