Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question.......... >

Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........

Notices

Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-31-2007, 03:34 PM
  #121  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Semper Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MOBILEMERCMAN
A bad day boating is always better than a good day inside.
Depends on what you break I'd rather stay home than break a drive or engine!
Semper Fi is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:14 PM
  #122  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Its still better boating, besides if it was going to break waiting a day or two doesn't make it any easier.
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:14 PM
  #123  
Registered
 
monstaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: long island, newyork
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Audiofn
Yes but on the smooth side the tile will slide from side to side much easier. America's cup boat spend more money on speed then anyone and they no longer sand the bottoms they make them as perfectly smooth as they can.
maybe for them, but sail boats dont run over 100
monstaaa is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:26 PM
  #124  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lafayette,La
Posts: 6,194
Received 293 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Enforcer2
I have heard of and tried different size pitchs on outers and centers. The problem with outeres being so high is when you turn boat they will cavitate. I went to four blades and problem was non existent.

25" centers would be a lot easier to find.

I want to keep the top of engine cowlings as close to even with each other as possible.

Here's a pict of a new Homeland Security Midnight.
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...d.php?t=176114

52 ft long.... jackplates..
Attached Thumbnails Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........-57a6_3.jpg  
open87 is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 07:40 PM
  #125  
Registered
 
TUFFboat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cambridge, Ontario
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Enforcer2;
I'm going to ditto the info from MOBILEMERCMAN and add this... Ultimately you will check your height by doing your slip calulation. If your percentage slip is much greater than about 15%, than you know to lower that motor.
On a VEE I would try to get the props as close together as possible. I remember when people used to angle the motors on the transom to get them closer at the prop.
TUFFboat is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 08:50 PM
  #126  
Registered
 
Enforcer2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocean Pines, Maryland. Wish I was at MANGOS in MIAMI!
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by open72


LOL I've actuall seen one continious jack plate or trips on a Deep Impact
Enforcer2 is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 08:55 PM
  #127  
Registered
 
Enforcer2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocean Pines, Maryland. Wish I was at MANGOS in MIAMI!
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This picture is really what I am interested in knowing.

This is an Apace and I know there are obvious differences.

water pickups on transom (CAN get for Outboards), surface propellers( Chopper or Cleaver Props for outboards ), HD drives and tons of Torque (thIs I can't come up with .)

But the realtionship of where the prop shaft is to the notch and the v on the bottom is really what I am after.

SEE PICT and tell me what u think.

Thanks again everyone for the help...............Tony
Attached Thumbnails Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........-20285_9.jpg   Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........-20285_9-2.jpg  
Enforcer2 is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 09:03 PM
  #128  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are you trying to compare apples to oranges?
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 09:35 PM
  #129  
Registered
 
Enforcer2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocean Pines, Maryland. Wish I was at MANGOS in MIAMI!
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No...of course not but in relationship to the drive height and the notched transom how can I take advantage of my set up and how high should I go.

Do I run prop shafts even with bottom as before with the non notched transom or can I go as high as the above pict and actually see an increase in speed without sacrificing everything else.

It is nothing new for outboards to run much high er than your conventional stern drive boat: IE jack plates in conjuction with chopper props and low water pick ups.
Enforcer2 is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 09:43 PM
  #130  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tony, Do you have a rear angle picture of the stern?
As you now that hull has been a round and dialed in again and again. In short you can only raise the drives as high as you can get the props to carry the boat. The faster the boat the less you have to carry. That picture is probably of a 100 mph plus, maybe 110 mph plus boat. Different things apply as speed increases. What works at 80 is not what's best for 100 and vis versa.
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  


Quick Reply: Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.