Notices

Bugatti in salt water!

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-29-2014, 02:15 PM
  #61  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oneida Lake NY
Posts: 3,641
Received 29 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wobble
I see that the owner has been charged with fraud, car was insured for 2.2 mil. Might have got away with it had it not been for the original vid. Karma

http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2014/...bugatti-crash/
Saw that as well, seems the high performance car in hobby has more in common with performance boating than I thought
4bus is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 02:23 PM
  #62  
Registered
 
thisistank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Posts: 13,709
Received 3,020 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Sounds like an insurance company trying to typically weisel out of payment. Descrapancies in his story from an iPhone video? Yea, sure.

Dude paid a lot of cash to insure it for 2.2mil. I don't give a crap if he drive it into the lake on purpose. It's I insured, he paid to have it insured and they insured him. End of story.


Car still brought 277k at auction!!
thisistank is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 06:25 PM
  #63  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Joplin<MO
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't understand why the tow company didn't at least take it out of gear before pulling it out of the water....
mallatt442 is offline  
Old 08-30-2014, 09:00 AM
  #64  
bck
Charter Member#568
Charter Member
 
bck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 2,171
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

It was a different car that was auctioned for 277k
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks
bck is offline  
Old 08-30-2014, 04:51 PM
  #65  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,655
Received 887 Likes on 481 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thisistank
Sounds like an insurance company trying to typically weisel out of payment. Descrapancies in his story from an iPhone video? Yea, sure.

Dude paid a lot of cash to insure it for 2.2mil. I don't give a crap if he drive it into the lake on purpose. It's I insured, he paid to have it insured and they insured him. End of story.
Car still brought 277k at auction!!
Not sure I agree.....they agreed to cover an accident not a 1.2mm profit when you intentionally drive into the water! Water is like arson, they cover fire/theft and you torch the car then you get arrested for arson regardless of what the insurance coverage is.
Jupiter Sunsation is offline  
Old 08-30-2014, 06:21 PM
  #66  
Registered
 
thisistank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Posts: 13,709
Received 3,020 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
Not sure I agree.....they agreed to cover an accident not a 1.2mm profit when you intentionally drive into the water! Water is like arson, they cover fire/theft and you torch the car then you get arrested for arson regardless of what the insurance coverage is.
I was being sarcastic about purposely driving into the water. Obviously policy don't cover deliberate actions. However, why'd they cover the car for 2.2mil if it was a problem? They didn't baulk at insuring it for the agreed upon value (most likely replacement value plus presumed increase in value of such a collectible), or at taking what I presume was a heafty monthly insurance premium. they only baulk at paying out when it was time.

Maybe I just don't understand the dynamics of the incident. But as I see it, it's BS the insurance company is trying to back out.
thisistank is offline  
Old 08-30-2014, 07:16 PM
  #67  
bck
Charter Member#568
Charter Member
 
bck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 2,171
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Guy paid 1 mil for car and insured it for 2.2 mil. 1 month later it ends up in the water. Guy claims he swerved to avoid bird and/ or lost control looking for dropped phone. Video taken by some kids who liked the car shows up on YouTube proving his claims to be untrue. I think that's roughly the story.
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks

Last edited by bck; 08-30-2014 at 07:21 PM.
bck is offline  
Old 08-30-2014, 07:27 PM
  #68  
Registered
 
thisistank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Posts: 13,709
Received 3,020 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bck
Guy paid 1 mil for car and insured it for 2.2 mil. 1 month later it ends up in the water. Guy claims he swerved to avoid bird and/ or lost control looking for dropped phone. Video taken by some kids who liked the car shows up on YouTube proving his claims to be untrue. I think that's roughly the story.
Story I heard was he was reaching for his phone (at least that's what the article says) never heard the bird story. Watched the video. Can't tell f*ck all what he's doing inside. And again, insurance company insured it for double it's value, that's on them. Whether he wrecked it driving out off the lot the instant he got the policy or 5 years from now. I tend to believe his story after watching the slow drift right off the shoulder. Done that reaching for something on the floorboard many times myself.
thisistank is offline  
Old 08-30-2014, 07:34 PM
  #69  
bck
Charter Member#568
Charter Member
 
bck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 2,171
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I'm not 100 % but I think the initial story was the bird and the video disproved that so it changed to looking for cell phone which I guess the video also disproved? Edit- the story above makes no mention of the bird but I could swear I recall that being reported at the time.
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks

Last edited by bck; 08-30-2014 at 07:37 PM.
bck is offline  
Old 08-30-2014, 07:42 PM
  #70  
Registered
 
thisistank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Posts: 13,709
Received 3,020 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bck
I'm not 100 % but I think the initial story was the bird and the video disproved that so it changed to looking for cell phone which I guess the video also disproved? Edit- the story above makes no mention of the bird but I could swear I recall that being reported at the time.
It's all good. My issue is insurance companies always try to get out of their end of the deal when the sh!t hits the fan. I mean lets just for the sakes of sh!ts and giggles say it happened exactly like the guy said. How bummed would you be - out your awesome ride, insurance company denying you and now you're fighting a criminal case....bad day right there.
thisistank is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.