Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
The 39 Rockit with 725 Ilmors and Indy drives hit 115 mph >

The 39 Rockit with 725 Ilmors and Indy drives hit 115 mph

Notices

The 39 Rockit with 725 Ilmors and Indy drives hit 115 mph

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-17-2010, 07:50 AM
  #31  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fairport,NY
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Am I the only one that thinks it's insane to expect ANY performance boat Manufacturer to reveal how many boats they built/sold? To get the ball rolling, maybe Jupiter could post the numbers from Sunsation by boat model?? Seriously,based on the posts Jupiter has made on the Hustler forum,it's obvious to me that we have a Sunsation owner with a serious case of "Hustler Envy!" Lol!
Lmarth is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 11:31 AM
  #32  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Casa De Kappy
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Comment:

I do not think the number of boats built has anything to do with quality or performance.

If you dispute this please see Mystic powerboats I doubt they have sold a ton of boats but they build some of the best and fastest running boats I have ever witnessed running on water.

Second, the less boats you build the more exotic I think the product is for the performance boater. I really think Hustler hit it out of the park with the 39 Rockit ie...home run type of model.

I do agree with posting a GPS photo of the speedo. Look if you have the time and money to shoot a video the final closing shot should be the GPS recall feature.

If you don't then just post a video with no reference to the speed obtained---why because you lose all credibility when you fail to video the speedo somewhere in the video.

I recall the Red Rockit had a photo of the screen GPS and that is the model which should be followed rather than sales pitch and rehetoric.

KAP

P.S. Tip why not video the GPS top speed and then followed by the footage of the boat running it really would make more believers than this footage.
kap328 is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 11:38 AM
  #33  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Casa De Kappy
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Additional Commentary:

As for the advertising campaign regarding smokin Cigarettes and that type of ad.

I found it to be distasteful to bash another manufacturer especially one that has earned their place in all areas of performance boating. Rather it is far better to tout what attributes the Hustler excel's in and performance features which are beyond normal expectations for the performance boater.

I am not in the advertising business but a consumer and targeted potential buyer---hence the feedback.

KAP
P.S. I'm sure Cigarette likes the free advertising and mention of their product collaterally in a rivals ads.
kap328 is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 12:15 PM
  #34  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: PA USA
Posts: 1,496
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Cspray I did not know that the Ilmore made that type of torque, which is very good. They need to state this on there web site. Thanks for the good information
baja27 is online now  
Old 04-17-2010, 12:59 PM
  #35  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,396
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lmarth
Am I the only one that thinks it's insane to expect ANY performance boat Manufacturer to reveal how many boats they built/sold? To get the ball rolling, maybe Jupiter could post the numbers from Sunsation by boat model?? Seriously,based on the posts Jupiter has made on the Hustler forum,it's obvious to me that we have a Sunsation owner with a serious case of "Hustler Envy!" Lol!

Actually he has NorTech envy...
Jassman is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 01:06 PM
  #36  
Diamond Member #001
Charter Member
iTrader: (2)
 
C_Spray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Coastal North Carolina
Posts: 4,808
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The spec's on the Gen IV Ilmor engines are here:
http://www.ilmor.com/marine/gen-IV.html


They state peak torque for the 725 as 649 @ 5,400 (which is 667.5 hp), and 725 hp @ 6,300 (which is 604 ft-lb).

Customryder: Here are the equations:

Hp = Torque x RPM / 5250
Torque = Hp x 5250 / Torque

Any time you apply a gear reduction (outdrive) to an engine, you increase the torque in proportion to the decrease in RPM. Because the Ilmor revs higher than the Mercury, the Imor can run a higher gear reduction to get the same prop RPM.

Ilmor @6,300/1.5 ratio = 4,200 rpm
Ilmor engine torque at 6300 = (725 x 5250)/6300 = 604
Ilmor prop torque at 6,300: 604 x 1.5 ratio = 906 ft-lb

From Mercury's web site: http://www.mercuryracing.com/sterndr...0sci/specs.php
Mercury @5200/1.24 ratio = 4,194 rpm (basically the same prop speed)
Mercury engine torque at 5200 = (700 x 5250)/5200 = 707
Mercury prop torque at 5200: 707 x 1.24 ratio = 877 ft-lb

That's the beauty of gear reduction options.

In the end, 725 hp is always more than 700 hp.

Disclaimer:
None of this takes into account parasitic losses through the transmission and drive. If it did, the Ilmor would look even better.
__________________
Retired! Boating full-time now.
C_Spray is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 01:27 PM
  #37  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,396
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C_Spray
The spec's on the Gen IV Ilmor engines are here:
http://www.ilmor.com/marine/gen-IV.html


They state peak torque for the 725 as 649 @ 5,400 (which is 667.5 hp), and 725 hp @ 6,300 (which is 604 ft-lb).

Customryder: Here are the equations:

Hp = Torque x RPM / 5250
Torque = Hp x 5250 / Torque

Any time you apply a gear reduction (outdrive) to an engine, you increase the torque in proportion to the decrease in RPM. Because the Ilmor revs higher than the Mercury, the Imor can run a higher gear reduction to get the same prop RPM.

Ilmor @6,300/1.5 ratio = 4,200 rpm
Ilmor engine torque at 6300 = (725 x 5250)/6300 = 604
Ilmor prop torque at 6,300: 604 x 1.5 ratio = 906 ft-lb

From Mercury's web site: http://www.mercuryracing.com/sterndr...0sci/specs.php
Mercury @5200/1.24 ratio = 4,194 rpm (basically the same prop speed)
Mercury engine torque at 5200 = (700 x 5250)/5200 = 707
Mercury prop torque at 5200: 707 x 1.24 ratio = 877 ft-lb

That's the beauty of gear reduction options.

In the end, 725 hp is always more than 700 hp.

Disclaimer:
None of this takes into account parasitic losses through the transmission and drive. If it did, the Ilmor would look even better.

Good info, explain from people that I have spoken with is that the Ilmors produce their power on the top end of the rpms which means you are always pushing the motor..and midrange would also be better on the Merc due to the SC.. Im not debating just asking questions so I can learn which way to go on my next boat.. Thanks Jeff
Jassman is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 02:17 PM
  #38  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Tom A.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,288
Received 84 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

The other advantage I see from Ilmor vs. Merc. 700 is no supercharger. I will take n/a power over supercharged power any day for reliability factors.
Tom A. is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 02:32 PM
  #39  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
pm203's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MA and NH
Posts: 3,707
Received 87 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Maybe so, but I like the Mercs much better for resale value.
pm203 is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 03:42 PM
  #40  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by pm203
Maybe so, but I like the Mercs much better for resale value.
We've been around for less than a decade. Look what we've done so far.
ILMORdude is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.