Oil spill in the gulf of Mexico
#143
[QUOTE=Steve 1;3103640]Well... maybe not?
It's on the wikipedia page for oil reserves.
Why in the world would you argue something like this?
I admit that I don't always believe wiki 100%, but this stuff seems fairly cut and dried.
It's on the wikipedia page for oil reserves.
Why in the world would you argue something like this?
I admit that I don't always believe wiki 100%, but this stuff seems fairly cut and dried.
#144
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
[QUOTE=jayboat;3103651][QUOTE=Steve 1;3103640]
Well... maybe not?
WHY ????????? Why Because we have upwards of 2.5 Trillion Barrels in various forms and that big Saudi field is 30% water the last I looked where is that shown?
Well... maybe not?
WHY ????????? Why Because we have upwards of 2.5 Trillion Barrels in various forms and that big Saudi field is 30% water the last I looked where is that shown?
Last edited by Steve 1; 05-06-2010 at 01:23 PM.
#145
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
We need to get up to speed here,This is just one!
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/...news2.13s.html
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/...news2.13s.html
#146
We need to get up to speed here,This is just one!
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/...news2.13s.html
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/...news2.13s.html
I hope it's true, just wondering why it wasn't included in the wiki stuff.
#150
I have no idea why a completely public document like this http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911, was not used as a reference point. At any rate, a simple slip of a decimal point or two.
I do remember those emails about the Bakken oil though. Some even went so far as to reference sites that totally refuted their headlines.
I do remember those emails about the Bakken oil though. Some even went so far as to reference sites that totally refuted their headlines.