Formula 242 ls Wanted
#11
Platinum Member
Charter Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: so. WI
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had one with twin small blocks years ago, and they were built strokers. Struggled to do 60 on stock 260's, did slightly over 70 GPS when I was done. IMHO, it's too much boat for a single small-block/Alpha, regardless how strong you build that one engine. You aren't going to hit 50 unless it's on a trailer. The boat requires twins or a healthy single big-block.
Keep in mind this hull has quite a bit of factory hook in the last three feet or so of the bottom all the way to the transom. Makes for nice, easy to handle ride for the novice boater, but it porpoises substantially at higher speeds, and requires tabs (which causes drag and slows you down) to keep the porpoising under control. All of the 242LS's have it, and it's not worth trying to remove it for results that may be less than expected. You won't ever see this porpoising tendency in a single SB or BB install- it just won't go fast enough in stock condition for that trait to be exhibitied.
The 242LS also has the goofy Quicksilver controls- you need the SR1 to get into split sticks.
Still a great boat, if kept within its design criteria. We enjoyed ours- it had every factory option including a rare McLeod bolster interior.
Jim
#13
Registered
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your feelings are correct; you will be slow.
I had one with twin small blocks years ago, and they were built strokers. Struggled to do 60 on stock 260's, did slightly over 70 GPS when I was done. IMHO, it's too much boat for a single small-block/Alpha, regardless how strong you build that one engine. You aren't going to hit 50 unless it's on a trailer. The boat requires twins or a healthy single big-block.
Keep in mind this hull has quite a bit of factory hook in the last three feet or so of the bottom all the way to the transom. Makes for nice, easy to handle ride for the novice boater, but it porpoises substantially at higher speeds, and requires tabs (which causes drag and slows you down) to keep the porpoising under control. All of the 242LS's have it, and it's not worth trying to remove it for results that may be less than expected. You won't ever see this porpoising tendency in a single SB or BB install- it just won't go fast enough in stock condition for that trait to be exhibitied.
The 242LS also has the goofy Quicksilver controls- you need the SR1 to get into split sticks.
Still a great boat, if kept within its design criteria. We enjoyed ours- it had every factory option including a rare McLeod bolster interior.
Jim
I had one with twin small blocks years ago, and they were built strokers. Struggled to do 60 on stock 260's, did slightly over 70 GPS when I was done. IMHO, it's too much boat for a single small-block/Alpha, regardless how strong you build that one engine. You aren't going to hit 50 unless it's on a trailer. The boat requires twins or a healthy single big-block.
Keep in mind this hull has quite a bit of factory hook in the last three feet or so of the bottom all the way to the transom. Makes for nice, easy to handle ride for the novice boater, but it porpoises substantially at higher speeds, and requires tabs (which causes drag and slows you down) to keep the porpoising under control. All of the 242LS's have it, and it's not worth trying to remove it for results that may be less than expected. You won't ever see this porpoising tendency in a single SB or BB install- it just won't go fast enough in stock condition for that trait to be exhibitied.
The 242LS also has the goofy Quicksilver controls- you need the SR1 to get into split sticks.
Still a great boat, if kept within its design criteria. We enjoyed ours- it had every factory option including a rare McLeod bolster interior.
Jim
#14
Platinum Member
Charter Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: so. WI
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I cured the boat's not-so-great handling qualities at high speeds by buying an Active Thunder.
The paint on the boat was the factory Imron option.
#15
Registered
there are some really clean 242's listed, 87-891 are the best years, I will link them when I get a chance,,, minnepolis craigslist has a nice one listed the others I'll link as I see them
#19
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
I may know a VERY nice 272 for sale in Gloucester. Nice Allum. trailer, new interior, BRAND NEW long blocks. I bet you can get it for around 15.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Put your best foot forward!
#20
Registered
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I said in your other thread, you'll be happier with a 272 than a 242 if you want to do much boating in Buzzard's Bay. Get one with bolsters, if possible. A 272 with twin small-blocks won't be a rocket, but it should do about 60 and should be reasonably fuel-efficient.