Notices

Rebuild on 850's

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-25-2010, 02:50 AM
  #21  
CAM
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Young Performance
To make it real simple you just use the actual 1075 cam and pulleys. You can also buy the actual 1075 ecm, or have the 850 ecm programmed to the 1075 specs.
Eddie
Easy enough then, thanks for responding. Not sure what shop this is but they replaced the 2.3 units with some 2.9's making the 1075 more like a 1200.

[youtube]watch?v=-RF3krHbGdw[/youtube]

Last edited by CAM; 12-25-2010 at 02:53 AM.
CAM is offline  
Old 12-25-2010, 05:34 AM
  #22  
Registered
Platinum Member
 
maxonmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Union N.J.
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CAM
Easy enough then, thanks for responding. Not sure what shop this is but they replaced the 2.3 units with some 2.9's making the 1075 more like a 1200.

watch?v=-RF3krHbGdw
What's a 2.3 or 2.9 Unit??? By the way... That motor doesn't sound too good at the end of that tape....

Last edited by maxonmike; 12-25-2010 at 05:41 AM. Reason: Sounds like it done blown up.....
maxonmike is offline  
Old 12-25-2010, 10:56 AM
  #23  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

The 1075's are no where near out of blower. There is no need to replace the 2.3's. I have used 2.3L quads in the past to make well over 1400 hp. The biggest hurdle is the ecm. Both the 850 and 1075 have an electronic boost bypass that controls the boost. The only way to increase the boost is by programming it into the ecm. You can change the pulleys all you want and it won't help unless you get into the ecm. That is why I said to get the ecm from the 1075 to put on your 850.
By the way, the Merc 1200's use the same 2.3 L quads as the 850 and 1075.
Eddie
Young Performance is offline  
Old 12-26-2010, 03:46 PM
  #24  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Roswell, Ga
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maxonmike
What's a 2.3 or 2.9 Unit??? By the way... That motor doesn't sound too good at the end of that tape....
I didn't think so either. What was the last number you saw?
twin screws is offline  
Old 12-26-2010, 06:13 PM
  #25  
CAM
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maxonmike
What's a 2.3 or 2.9 Unit??? By the way... That motor doesn't sound too good at the end of that tape....
The blower size, as Youngs would say and probably has already, the stock engines come with 2.3L blowers. This compant replaced the stock ones with a pair of 2.9L Whipple units.

Originally Posted by Young Performance
The 1075's are no where near out of blower. The biggest hurdle is the ecm. Both the 850 and 1075 have an electronic boost bypass that controls the boost. The only way to increase the boost is by programming it into the ecm.
By the way, the Merc 1200's use the same 2.3 L quads as the 850 and 1075.
Eddie
I kinda figured as much, thats how it is with the Roe blowers on Vipers where you can only physically mod so far until the rest is finished electronicly.
Even more so then I'd imagine with the 2.9 units and reprogramming the ecm you'd be able to go 1500+ without too much fuss.
CAM is offline  
Old 12-27-2010, 07:22 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The stock 2.3's are actually very near capacity because of the bypass system. They're turning just over 14,000 at stock peak engine rpm which was the mfg's max rpm.

We pickup 150-hp by lowering blower speed with the larger SC's. Just upgrading to the 1075 cam, pulley, belt, springs and PCM upgrade would be a world of difference.

The stock motors we tested made 1053hp in stock trim. With our large SC's, it made 1240hp on pump gas, then made 1375 on race gas.

The motor is fine on the high RPM, thats what they sound like at 6000+.

We rebuild the factory SC's, which should be done around 250 hours on 1075's. We also have more efficient 2.3 liters and the larger 2.9 liters.
Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 12-27-2010, 07:38 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here's an image of the Mercury 850/1075sci with our 2.3L. This is in one of the Statements.
Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 12-27-2010, 07:40 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here's our 2.9 liter sc package, with our new upgraded belt system that fits all 850/1075/1200.



Whipple Charged is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.