Originally Posted by breakitout
(Post 3619840)
Ever owned an LS /6.2 gm powered vehicle (cough Escalade.. wish they kept the 6.0 that was a much better engine)? I am highly suspect of GM's quality/assembly of the 6.2s. Great performer but I doubt the durability especially in large numbers of marine applications. Just my preference I would rather have a 502 based engine for marine use. Will be interesting to see how they perform over the long term, starting to see more 6.2s in skiboats too.
Chuck, an answer to this?
Originally Posted by techman
(Post 3620080)
But yeah, as is, it looks like the two warts on Lemmy Kilmister's face (see MotorHead). No offense Lemmy!
|
Originally Posted by pm203
(Post 3620112)
Looks like the alien head from the movie aliens.
thats what I thought too.. Guarantee someone will custom paint it to look like it some day! |
Originally Posted by pm203
(Post 3620112)
Looks like the alien head from the movie aliens.
|
I'd take Ilmor all day over this. The 565 looks worse than the 502HO. FUGLY
|
It sure runs well in the 42 Nor-Tech Monte Carlo. I went out in that boat yesterday. Plenty of torque. Just eased up on plane. Very quiet with x-haust, yet still good sound. Digital shifting is smooth. Speed is in the mid-eighties. Very fast for that size boat, power level and price. 8.7L displacement gets my vote.
|
Originally Posted by blkmtrfan
(Post 3620132)
Tough crowd here ...
Looks like allot of great engineering to me :ernaehrung004: |
Originally Posted by FasterFaster
(Post 3621023)
It sure runs well in the 42 Nor-Tech Monte Carlo. I went out in that boat yesterday. Plenty of torque. Just eased up on plane. Very quiet with x-haust, yet still good sound. Digital shifting is smooth. Speed is in the mid-eighties. Very fast for that size boat, power level and price. 8.7L displacement gets my vote.
wish I could have gotten a ride, thats one sexy looking boat! |
Originally Posted by C_Spray
(Post 3619831)
ILMOR's 570 is based on LS architecture, features variable cam timing, and passed their in-house 24-hour WOT max-load durability test.
Michael |
Originally Posted by Michael1
(Post 3626657)
24 hours??? Whoopty doo! I hope that is a misprint. The auto companies run 200 to 400 hours of WOT. If it isn't a misprint, remind me not to buy an Ilmor engine.
Michael |
Originally Posted by Michael1
(Post 3626657)
24 hours??? Whoopty doo! I hope that is a misprint. The auto companies run 200 to 400 hours of WOT. If it isn't a misprint, remind me not to buy an Ilmor engine.
Michael I'm sure that the 565 and 570 will both be reliable packages. Competition among engine manufacturers is good for the consumer. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.