Lawyers!! Please help with clarification Please
#32
Registered
You think just because we oppose this that we all want to breath dirty air and drink dirty water and chit all over our lakes? Reminds me of someone else........ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH87c0h4WK8
#33
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Saint Petersburg Fl
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Amen, I miss shell key nearly every weekend of the summer.
When it comes to ownership, land rights, easements, etc., the majority of the country and states go by the MHHW line (the average of the higher high water height of each tidal day observed and averaged over the National Tidal Datum Epoch).
However, when it comes to the environmental idiots, there's no logical reasoning behind anything they do, they just make the sht up as they go.
We lost one of our best boating party hangouts down here a few years ago and it is now a "bird sanctuary." Birdsht, I say. There's nothing on there except sea gulls, but go within ten yards of the shoreline and the nazi azzholes are all over you.
However, when it comes to the environmental idiots, there's no logical reasoning behind anything they do, they just make the sht up as they go.
We lost one of our best boating party hangouts down here a few years ago and it is now a "bird sanctuary." Birdsht, I say. There's nothing on there except sea gulls, but go within ten yards of the shoreline and the nazi azzholes are all over you.
#34
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
#35
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: burlington, iowa
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
go with what micheal1 wrote, agents are required to inform you of statute(print and lamenate several copies). on new changes we were required to inform public and tell where changes were posted or present copy of changes. they cannot impose regs into channel, lot of communities try to impose no wake, speed and noise into working channel, reality has to exist! the state and federal agents i worked with always bragged; 90% of law enforcement is baffling bull***t. the problem is most judges are so screwed up liberal your chance in court is low.
#36
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Gibraltar, MI
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You think just because we oppose this that we all want to breath dirty air and drink dirty water and chit all over our lakes? Reminds me of someone else........ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH87c0h4WK8
Maybe I'm just confused because I'm a moderate, oh wait, that's not it, it's just I don't like everyone else's $hit all over the place. And it's not just trash, it pretty nasty when you need to dodge condoms, ****, etc.
Again -- this is really sad to see happen, but I'm not really surprised...to bad for the respectful users of the island.
#37
Registered
Indy is totally right, it's a shame that a few people screw it up for everyone. I'm not really sure why you are arguing. We all agree the environmentalist go out of their way to do this kind of stuff, but it's only giving them the reason to do it why they are able.
Maybe I'm just confused because I'm a moderate, oh wait, that's not it, it's just I don't like everyone else's $hit all over the place. And it's not just trash, it pretty nasty when you need to dodge condoms, ****, etc.
Again -- this is really sad to see happen, but I'm not really surprised...to bad for the respectful users of the island.
Maybe I'm just confused because I'm a moderate, oh wait, that's not it, it's just I don't like everyone else's $hit all over the place. And it's not just trash, it pretty nasty when you need to dodge condoms, ****, etc.
Again -- this is really sad to see happen, but I'm not really surprised...to bad for the respectful users of the island.
You going to close down the roadways for littering too?
#38
Littering laws?? You can not even go near it. Before it was a privately owned and was a free for all. The island was purchased for some 400,000 by whatever agency.