Notices

It's not just us....

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-27-2013, 09:17 AM
  #31  
mmb
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This thread is beyond hilarious!!! I guess modern technology has no role in today’s boats.... Just hoped up old fishing boats with steps WOW
mmb is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 09:25 AM
  #32  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 3,747
Received 866 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

Is this why I have a strange obsession to put a tuna tower on my boat?
Keith Atlanta is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 10:00 AM
  #33  
Registered
 
bluellama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: 1000 Islands/Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmb
This thread is beyond hilarious!!! I guess modern technology has no role in today’s boats.... Just hoped up old fishing boats with steps WOW
Nobody was talking about the role technology has in today's boats. We were having a great discussion about whether old racers like DA, Jim Wynne, Brownie and the rest of the pioneers, who stuffed the biggest engines they could into proven OFFSHORE hulls, had a bigger influence on today's go fast boats than the square grouper fishermen of later years.....
bluellama is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 10:08 AM
  #34  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 5,004
Received 735 Likes on 330 Posts
Default

But those offshore fishermen spend a lot more time offshore in wave conditions we only B.S. about being in.
Interceptor is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 10:11 AM
  #35  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,397
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

For you doubters out there read this story http://www.americancustomyachts.com/...-edge-2009.pdf that has a man in it like Don Aronow but earlier in the evolution of offshore named Jim Smith whose ideas from fishing went directly into performance boating.

I will recant and say sportfishing and offshore racing feed each other in the early days, technology was swapped shared etc for the good of evolving the boats that were selling. Remember early on there was no market for performance boats other than little lake type boats, offshore was not a sport in the 50's. Read how Dick Bertram, Sam Griffin were in awe as the lost 8 straight what was called a "Bimini Start" or today a shotgun start to a larger boat built by Smith in their 31' Bertram.

So before you fall off your chair laughing, technology was pushed in fishing boats before it was in offshore pleasure boats.

Can some one tell me of a boat construction technology that was first used in an offshore boat before it was used in any other type of boat? I think you will find carbon fiber and a bunch of things like that came from sailboats first, but I could be wrong?
HabanaJoe is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 10:11 AM
  #36  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 5,004
Received 735 Likes on 330 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pullmytrigger
Not in the classic vee bottom that we seem to be talking about from the pics you posted..And if there is its outnumbered 1000 to 1 by the BBC sterndrive combo. An ASD isnt even a inboard with a rudder in the classic sense.
I's consider the sterndrive as probably one of the worst designs for power transmission available.
Interceptor is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 11:48 AM
  #37  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: oshawa ontario
Posts: 4,830
Received 94 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Interceptor
I's consider the sterndrive as probably one of the worst designs for power transmission available.
That is debatable and I never said it was the best, But you cant argue with the numbers.
pullmytrigger is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 11:58 AM
  #38  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 3,747
Received 866 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HabanaJoe
I think you will find carbon fiber and a bunch of things like that came from sailboats first, but I could be wrong?
Thats true, but not exactly correct. They are carbon fiber hulls, but Americas Cup boats use Nomex as the core. You would never think of using Nomex in our hulls - its hygroscopic. It actually absorbs moisture.

A lot of enthusiasts buy former "cup" boats only to have a slower and slower boat after the years. Its no surprise "cup" boats actually get SIGNIFICANTLY heavier year after year since the Nomex absorbs water and moisture. Aircraft control surfaces and trailing edges do the same thing.

Its a good example... but kinda not a good example technically.
Keith Atlanta is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 12:04 PM
  #39  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,397
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Interceptor
I's consider the sterndrive as probably one of the worst designs for power transmission available.
From efficiency sense yes but from a practical matter it was one of the best innovations until this generation of high Hp outboard came along for being able to get performance from any larger hull. The ability to trim the boat has had a greater effect on the speeds at which boats can go I bet than any other single product. Until then you could only ever trim the bow of a large boat that had inboards down - you now could raise the bow lifting the boat out of the water and keep the line of thrust parallel to the surface - huge leap forward.
HabanaJoe is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 12:09 PM
  #40  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,397
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Keith Atlanta
Thats true, but not exactly correct. They are carbon fiber hulls, but Americas Cup boats use Nomex as the core. You would never think of using Nomex in our hulls - its hygroscopic. It actually absorbs moisture.

A lot of enthusiasts buy former "cup" boats only to have a slower and slower boat after the years. Its no surprise "cup" boats actually get SIGNIFICANTLY heavier year after year since the Nomex absorbs water and moisture. Aircraft control surfaces and trailing edges do the same thing.

Its a good example... but kinda not a good example technically.
Agreed, but you know my point and that is there is not enough money spent on high performance pleasure boats to drive "lots" of innovations hence they are borrowed from elsewhere.

Look at safety after the crashes at Key West last year (RIP) how much money has been sunk into preventing that in the future, who is researching better canopies or pods - offshore takes technology from other venues and evolves it into whatever it needs it to be, I would still bet very little "new" anything is pioneered in this sport for either high performance pleasure or racing?

ps - here is the larger problem it's 1:00 pm on a great Saturday, I just came home from one son's batting practice, have a double header starting at 4 today and I'm not out on the water!!!! That is really the problem who cares what came first or last - enjoy it while you can! I spent yesterday in the hospital with my father, who failed his stress test with a major blockage and then had to do the stint thing right away - life is short enjoy it now!!!

Last edited by HabanaJoe; 07-27-2013 at 12:14 PM.
HabanaJoe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.