Notices

Seven Marine vs Verado

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-04-2017, 06:41 AM
  #41  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 5,135
Received 258 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Double Rigged
Not sure if you all remember but Nortech ran a 390 w triple 557's some time ago. Boat ran 88mph or so. At the time everyone was stoked. Now price out 3 motors at 60k each. 180k.
Nortech builds a 390 with quad 400's. Similar hp. Motors around 30k each. 120k total.
Seems like easy decision for me. By the way boat ran 100mph.
I have seatrialed many Intrepid's with 7 power. They are also louder than the 400r also. However there seems to be the cool factor of owing a boat with them as not everybody has them.
It also does not seem Seven marine is trying to break any records or doing what Merc is with the R series outboard.

Seven seems to be happy as Sydways pointed out, putting 3 or 4 on the back of the BIG CC's coming out these days and pushing those heavy beast to pretty decent speeds that they were not seeing before.
Nate5.0 is offline  
Old 01-04-2017, 12:01 PM
  #42  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,016
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phragle
I just have a hard time wrapping my brain around putting that much weight and torque on a transom and having it stay in one piece,,,,
Was this rigging or operator error? Two rappers........

TBAG is offline  
Old 01-04-2017, 12:36 PM
  #43  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,828
Received 1,195 Likes on 519 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TBAG
Was this rigging or operator error? Two rappers........
I posted about it above.

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
Yes, it was a rigging issue and/or metal failure.


But it illustrates the point of why the Seven Marine motors we developed.

Comparable power/performance with less infrastructure.
Sometimes 20% less.
Sometimes 33% less.



More details from another site:
The clamp bracket did not break......... and it happened at 40 MPH in calm waters..... we hauled it out and supported the motor until the guys from Midnight came to take it away...... The motor was ok,,,,, no water ingestion, infact there was no visible damage. It did damage the motor next to it with it's prop... took a chunck out of the cav plate.
The motor was through bolted to a plate to get it higher and the plate had studs welded to it to attach it to the transom. there were no through bolts directly holding the motor onto the transom. The studs sheared right at the plate and the motor was left dangling off one remaining stud and the tie-bar.

Last edited by Sydwayz; 01-04-2017 at 12:39 PM.
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 01-04-2017, 01:30 PM
  #44  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
cigrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Endicott, NY
Posts: 2,576
Received 159 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
I posted about it above.






More details from another site:


I think you guys are wrong, that is just the tilt on the integrated Stern Thruster, helps with parking.....lol.
cigrocket is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 09:12 AM
  #45  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN/ Punta Gorda, FL
Posts: 1,333
Received 160 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
I'm not confirming your information, but I do offer this picture from the interwebs:
Million dollar boat and a POS trailer. wow.
PremierPOWER is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 12:13 PM
  #46  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

they had to save $$ somewhere trailer first then truck lol
MSGANGWAY is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 04:00 PM
  #47  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What about fuel consumption on these boats? Similar HP either 3 triple 7 and 4 400r's!!!!! I would have to think having one less engine would burn less fuel, and with guys putting 1000hrs on a boat that could add up.
turbom700 is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 04:04 PM
  #48  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 6,651
Received 1,329 Likes on 742 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbom700
What about fuel consumption on these boats? Similar HP either 3 triple 7 and 4 400r's!!!!! I would have to think having one less engine would burn less fuel, and with guys putting 1000hrs on a boat that could add up.
I am not sure if you have the cash for something like that if you really care about cost of fuel.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 04:51 PM
  #49  
DFC
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
I am not sure if you have the cash for something like that if you really care about cost of fuel.
And the ~$60K savings on quad 400Rs vs. triples Sevens can buy a lot of fuel...

Still would be interesting to see some data on fuel consumption of quad Verado vs triple Sevens at the same speeds on the same hull.
DFC is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 05:17 PM
  #50  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,655
Received 887 Likes on 481 Posts
Default

I saw a quad verado Midnight Express at the place that serviced my boat. Mechanic is Merc Platinum Certified, 30+ years in high performance. I was in awe of the quad power boat and his reply was priceless.........he said look at the trouble you are having keeping two I/O's going, why would you want to tackle 4 motors on a single boat!

BTW the 39 ME was in because the outside motors were eating lower units......if owner was running it hard, it the outside motor would run dry in hard turns.
Jupiter Sunsation is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.