I have an arch on the Hawk and would consider radar for it but it would take away a great seat, right Waterfoul!!!!:D :D
|
Hey Fred!!!how the heck are you?you workin on the 40?cant wait for spring...winter is killin me. your daughters can sit on top of the raydome!!!!
|
Originally posted by fred I have an arch on the Hawk and would consider radar for it but it would take away a great seat, right Waterfoul!!!!:D :D |
Got radar. Have had it since 95. Wouldnt ever own a cruiser without it. Always thought that radar was for big water, but I find it indispensable for inland water as well.
I'm not sold on color radar. Pretty but distracting. LCDs are fine these days - much better than they used to be, but theyre a long way from being able to give the feedback that a CRT can. Beam spread is a biggie. A 24" dome cant resolve nearly as well as a 48" array. This has nothing to do with range or power, it is the ability to discern individual targets. I have an open array with a 48" bar. I can pick out individual ducks ahead of me. If the water is calm, I can pick out a floating stick 1" diameter by 2 foot long at 35mph. My unit works well in a fog. You have to tune the pulse for it but I can see my way anywhere in the thickest fog (sure the water droplets affect the echoes, but you learn how to tune for it and how to read it). I can track and spot rain clouds and determine the speed at which a storm is coming. I can see it increase in density or watch it dissipate. I use charting GPS and Radar in conjunction. If I could only have ONE unit it would be like this: If I were operating in an area I knew well, Radar would be my unit of choice. If I were in unfamiliar area, charting GPS would be my choice. hope this helps. (I use Raytheon, but have seen Furuno units that I like just as well). |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.