The question that PISSES me off the most is ---- Why when Clinton was bombing Iraq their wasn't any protesting. I have yet to here a liberal answer it. Why is it that when clinton was in office he was for the removal (regime change) of Suddam and now he is against it. What has changed. Clinton said that if Suddam wasnt removed from power and the WMD destroyed it would become a problem. He also knew that he couldn't get the UN to help so he didn't even ask (the only smart thing the man ever did)
SC--- why don't you prove him wrong--You act like the resident expert here ---You should be able to prove him wrong. (If he is) I will put my money on him not you since I tend to think that his IQ is at least one notch higher than yours just from reading his posts. I personally would love to meet him in person and have a talk.