Tribunal of three, my a$$. Post both sides like we have always done, and let the board members sort it out. The only thing that needs to be changed is the name calling and ad hominem attacks. Frankly, those only make the offering party look bad, anyway.
This technique has worked in EVERY OSO DISPUTE EVER POSTED, INCLUDING APACHE THREADS!!! (They just take a little longer.) The complaining member may not have gotten justice, but the member in the wrong has ALWAYS been outed and been ostracized to one extent or another.
Starting an OSO Court will only move this stuff out of the public eye. I researched the issue b/w Homan and LubeJobs42 this morning back to the original E-bay auction announcement by LubeJobs42. There is no clear answer in the threads. I would love to see the original E-Bay auction discription, but it was gone.
Homan, I would like to see you present your side. So far, you have been pretty vague in your accusations and even SemperFi was more specific on Gino's original "16yr thread" about what happened. Spit it out, man.