Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus >

Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Notices

Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-10-2006, 10:48 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

I'm trying to find comparitive tests for props, I have a 30ft Campion chase twin 496 HO's running 23p Rev 4 WOT 5000 rpm. want to switch to 25 p, The Rev 4 is a stern lift prop could use some more stern lift . How does hydromotive quad and Maximus compare.


Any Ideas?

Rick
docricky is offline  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:09 AM
  #2  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Pat McPherson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ivoryton, CT
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Both will give more stern lift but you will likely loose speed on top.
Ask over on Prop Talk...
__________________
Patrick
Pat McPherson is offline  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:17 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
throttleup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cajun Country
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Your rpm is right where you want it. Why do you want to go to a higher pitch?

What is your top speed at wide open throttle? Do you have some complaints about the performance of the boat? Does it feel as if the bow is too heavy, or light?

Matt
throttleup is offline  
Old 08-11-2006, 12:35 PM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Hi Matt

Speed WOT is 80mph gps, concern is bow feels to light handles rough water much better with 2 heavy adults in V berth Anything up to 60mph I need to keep trim right down and sometimes use K planes with passengers in the back. Not worried about top end want to improve midrange performance and economy, and get more pressure on bow.

Regards

Rick
docricky is offline  
Old 08-11-2006, 02:43 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Revelocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Warwick, MD USA
Posts: 670
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Your hull is very similar to the Velocity 320 and the handling characterisitics sound similar indeed. The 320 runs a 26" or 27" Hydro 4 blade with the same power. The Hydro works great on the hull. Good luck.
Revelocity is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 11:43 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Honeoye, NY
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Um, just what gear ratio drive are you running? Cause if it is a Bravo with standard 1.5 to 1, there is something funny going on here. It is mathematically impossible to achieve 80 MPH with a 23" prop driven by an engine turning 5000 RPM through a 1.5 to 1 reduction drive. Zero slip (or 100% efficiency) would yield 73 MPH and that too is impossible. --- Jer
jpclear is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 04:16 PM
  #7  
Charter Member #927
Charter Member
 
Payton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 4,834
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

I believe the 80 mph. I have a friend with the same boat with 24" Bravos and 330hp 454s. He tops out at 70. His boat doen not handle rough water like a true deep V though. I think it's a 23* hull.
Payton is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 06:36 PM
  #8  
Masher touches my
Gold Member
 
Outdrive1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Originally Posted by jpclear
Um, just what gear ratio drive are you running? Cause if it is a Bravo with standard 1.5 to 1, there is something funny going on here. It is mathematically impossible to achieve 80 MPH with a 23" prop driven by an engine turning 5000 RPM through a 1.5 to 1 reduction drive. Zero slip (or 100% efficiency) would yield 73 MPH and that too is impossible. --- Jer

Even with a 1.36 drive you would need 0% slip to get those speeds. If you could run that effecient (and you can't) that would be a set-up that I wouldn't mess with. Change your gps from KPH to MPH or buy one that works.
As far as prop the Hydro has ton of stern lift.
Outdrive1 is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 08:20 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Honeoye, NY
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Thanks BADK--. At least someone here knows what I'm talking about. And Payton's friend's #'s could just possibly be believable, cause 24" of pitch is not 23", and 70 MPH is not 80 MPH. But that would still only be about 8% slip which is usually only found with very light, hi-perf cats. Any recreational "V" hull that can achieve 11% slip or less is running VERY efficiently. I think the REAL experts at Throttle-Up will back me up on this. --- Jer
jpclear is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 10:34 PM
  #10  
Charter Member #927
Charter Member
 
Payton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 4,834
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus

Originally Posted by jpclear
Thanks BADK--. At least someone here knows what I'm talking about. And Payton's friend's #'s could just possibly be believable, cause 24" of pitch is not 23", and 70 MPH is not 80 MPH. But that would still only be about 8% slip which is usually only found with very light, hi-perf cats. Any recreational "V" hull that can achieve 11% slip or less is running VERY efficiently. I think the REAL experts at Throttle-Up will back me up on this. --- Jer
My point was that with a 23*V and and a very light hull. 200 more HP could equal 10mph. I think he has more pitch on his prop now. The bow feels light because it is light. He's running like a bass boat.
Payton is offline  


Quick Reply: Rev 4 vs Hydromotive vs maximus


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.