Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Hydromotive Nose Cone or Crescent Shaped Lower? >

Hydromotive Nose Cone or Crescent Shaped Lower?

Notices

Hydromotive Nose Cone or Crescent Shaped Lower?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-19-2007, 10:58 AM
  #11  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Reb,
Any Mercury Mirage should do. This is an "on plane" test only. Maybe a 25-27P.
BenPerfected is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 12:37 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
BY U BOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HOUSTON ,TX
Posts: 8,779
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have been told that a hydo nose cone is good on cats b/c they have more stern lift and that the imco or bobs nose cone is better for a V-hull. Is this true?
BY U BOY is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 02:57 PM
  #13  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Rebel_Heart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LOTO
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just spoke with IMCO. They said their lower units retail for $4,400, while the Bravo Shop's cost $2,200. What's the difference?

There seems to be that there is speed to be gained by just changing to the more aerodynamic units. Now, to determine if the boat can handle a shortie.
Rebel_Heart is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:51 PM
  #14  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Reb,
If your current Bravo lower is working for you, you just need the lower case and you can use most your current parts. Any outdrive tech should be able to swap the parts. I think you just need a new vertical shaft (shorter). Mr. Gadgets, correct? Worst case you can sell your current lower complete. If you get Max Machine to do the work, they will probably take your stock Bravo stuff in trade.
BenPerfected is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 09:43 PM
  #15  
Charter Member #601
Charter Member
 
Mr Gadgets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Holland, Mi USA.
Posts: 3,276
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thats correct Ben. The satin lower case goes for about $2200 with shipping. Comes with the proper vertical shaft. The rest, if in good condition, swaps over and proper setup needs to be addressed.
And you are correct on the three blade.. just a planing test is all you are looking at..
Mr Gadgets is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 11:40 PM
  #16  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Rebel_Heart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LOTO
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. Mr. Gadgets do you sell the Imco lower? Is there a set-up that needs to be done, or just swap the internals? Trying to see what my next move is after checking the x-dim. Not looking forward to spending the money on new lowers, but it sounds as though this is the place to look for more speed.

I had a 27 Fountain that I couldn't get on plane with a 3 blade, so I know what you mean.
Rebel_Heart is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 05:03 AM
  #17  
Charter Member #601
Charter Member
 
Mr Gadgets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Holland, Mi USA.
Posts: 3,276
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Yes I do build and sell them. And yes they all need to be properly setup to live. pm me and I can give you more details, on the hows and whys of it. Or give me a call during the day.. my cell is 616-403-1006. If my day job keeps me busy, then leave a message and I will get back to you..

****
Mr Gadgets is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 12:18 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern NY
Posts: 5,325
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BenPerfected
On a twin drive boat, with the IMCO -2" lower unit and a 2" inch spacer (to establish a base line) speed went from 93 to 97 mph. Without the 2" spacer, 101 mph.
The point is the IMCO lower is very efficient vs. the Bravo lower even at same X. If you can get on plane a 3-blade prop, you would be a good candidate for the IMCO -2" shorty. Where else could you get 3-4 mph for $2500?

What was the boat these results were gained on? Brand, model, power etc.
RaggedEdge is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 04:19 PM
  #19  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Edge,
1987 Scarab Panther. 9500 lbs with light fuel and two aboard. Total about 1450-1500 HP. We ended a year later with approx.1550 HP another inch up on the X with 5-blade Herrings turning in at 107.0 MPH on GPS at Lake X. That put the hull efficiency at 250+. Not bad for an old resin bucket...
Ben
BenPerfected is offline  
Old 03-20-2007, 11:47 PM
  #20  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Rebel_Heart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LOTO
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BP
That's some serious speed! So you are running -2 Imco with 5 blade Herrings? Did you some upgrades to your Bravo drives besides the shorties?
Rebel_Heart is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Prater
Wanted
0
09-09-2008 08:31 AM
IRONMAN
Drives and Lower Units
4
02-20-2008 10:08 PM
Prater
General Q & A
6
05-08-2006 01:06 PM
SkiDoc
General Q & A
32
01-29-2005 11:24 PM
Pure Energy
General Boating Discussion
4
06-24-2004 09:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: Hydromotive Nose Cone or Crescent Shaped Lower?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.