Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Big strokes break drives ?????? >

Big strokes break drives ??????

Notices

Big strokes break drives ??????

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-24-2007, 07:54 PM
  #11  
Off the Radar
Platinum Member
 
Linster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Short Pump or Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
Contrary to what most people think, torque is proportional to displacement, rather than stroke alone. Of course, increasing the stroke, also increases the displacement, and torque. You're builder is probably right. I don't know what drive you have, but if you have a Bravo XR, you'll be good to about 600 ft-lbs., Bravo X to about 450 ft-lbs, and Bravo to about 400 ft-lbs. Of course, people routinely exceed these limits, but some of them also blow up drives.

Michael
Stoke makes more low end torque than bore. Both make torque, but stroke adds low end torque, bore is better for high rev's HP which boats do not normally do
Linster is offline  
Old 04-24-2007, 07:58 PM
  #12  
Off the Radar
Platinum Member
 
Linster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Short Pump or Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
There is nothing that says you have to build an engine square. The only reason it is done with marine engines is they want to keep the rpm down to about 5000 tops anyway. If you don't mind running a higher rpm, for a given displacement, you'll get more power out of an oversquare engine, because the large bore will allow for bigger valves and lower inertial loads, for higher rpm running.

Michael

How much bigger valve can you get on a BBC other than 2.25 Intake and 1.9 Exhaust? 4.6 bore is tops, Maybe a little but you have to have custom heads to do better.
Linster is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 12:21 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks like I'm a glutten for punishment again. Seems everytime someone posts an engine myth, and I explain what's going on, I get beat up about it, but here goes:

The myth that stroke produces torque and bore produces HP comes from the fact that "all else being equal" when you increase the stroke, you aren't able to put bigger valves in, and hence airflow doesn't increase, hence torque goes up, but HP doesn't as much, since HP is a function of total airflow through the engine.

But, generally, if you increase the bore, you'll also put bigger valves in the head, or at the very least, unshroud the existing valves. This allows HP to increase, usually at the expense of bottom end torque, since the builder will then cam the engine for the top end HP.

Also, on high strung race engines, the RPM limit of the engine is based on piston speed, which increases with stroke. So that's why you'll see large bore, small stroke on displacement limited racing classes. Which of course also end up being very low on bottom end grunt.

Really has nothing to do with the stroke per se, and more to do with how the engine is setup.

Personally I'd NEVER turn down extra displacement. If I were worried about low end torque breaking drives, I'd simply give it more cam. Then I'd end up with the same low end torque and more top end HP due to both the displacement increase and the bigger bump stick.
bcarpman is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 12:43 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Strokes don't break drives, people break drives period.
ghittner is offline  
Old 04-26-2007, 04:57 AM
  #15  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Donzi502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys my take on this is that the bigger the arm the more control you have over it with the piston and rod. I would like to see anyone make serous torque with a 3" stroke. Wouldnt matter how much bore you have. By the way i love it when people tell me what i cant do. I gurantee i will make 800 or very close to it with 532. We have some not bad 98 octane pump gas down here. The queation is weather to use a 4,1/4 crank and make some more. The only limitation to the power is weather my wallet will streach for the heads and sheet metal intake required to make that power.
Check out this site for some big power options. These boys do marine engines and also confirm they can meet our HP need from a 532 marine engine or can supply heads and intake to do the job
www.sonnysracing.com/engines.php
Donzi502 is offline  
Old 04-26-2007, 07:54 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Donzi502
Guys my take on this is that the bigger the arm the more control you have over it with the piston and rod. I would like to see anyone make serous torque with a 3" stroke. Wouldnt matter how much bore you have. By the way i love it when people tell me what i cant do. I gurantee i will make 800 or very close to it with 532.
If you already know the answers, why did you ask the question?

If you could get the bore to make the same displacement with a 3in stroke, and you camed it right, you could make the same torque. It really doesn't matter what "your take on it" is, it's just basic IC engine theory.

Stroke may give you extra torque ON THE CRANK for a given force on the piston, but a bigger bore will give you more force on the piston top and hence the same overall torque out of the engine. Again, this is only if you don't go for more top end power with bigger valves, etc.
bcarpman is offline  
Old 04-27-2007, 09:27 AM
  #17  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
KAAMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 4,464
Received 78 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Interesting thread-----I will probably never do this, but I've always been interested in a 4.600" bore x 3.76" stroke (427 crank) naturally aspirated engine which brings it to somewhere right around 500cid. Just seems like it would be a fun project with that bore x stroke combo (not sure how long of a rod it would need) and some killer heads like the 315 AFR cnc'd heads I have now and see what kind of HP/Torque it would make @5800rpm.

Right now I have a pair of NA short deck 565cid engines 4.25" stroke x 4.600" bore (6.385" rod) with cnc'd 315 AFR's, Dart intake w/single Holley 950cfm, 9.5 cr, and Stellings full length tubular headers. It would be fun just to compare notes between the two different cubes size's.
KAAMA is offline  
Old 04-27-2007, 04:17 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: hudson florida
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree w/ ghittner, people break drives. I would like to see a 532 cid motor w/ no blower make 800hp. This can be achieved, but at what compression.... 14 to 1. Let's see how long a 14 to 1 motor lasts in a marine race application. Sonny is the man for power, but a, na 532, 800hp
NOMOGOFAST is offline  
Old 04-28-2007, 12:14 AM
  #19  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
articfriends's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: frankenmuth michigan
Posts: 7,149
Received 824 Likes on 377 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KAAMA
Interesting thread-----I will probably never do this, but I've always been interested in a 4.600" bore x 3.76" stroke (427 crank) naturally aspirated engine which brings it to somewhere right around 500cid. Just seems like it would be a fun project with that bore x stroke combo (not sure how long of a rod it would need) and some killer heads like the 315 AFR cnc'd heads I have now and see what kind of HP/Torque it would make @5800rpm.

Right now I have a pair of NA short deck 565cid engines 4.25" stroke x 4.600" bore (6.385" rod) with cnc'd 315 AFR's, Dart intake w/single Holley 950cfm, 9.5 cr, and Stellings full length tubular headers. It would be fun just to compare notes between the two different cubes size's.
Mark,if you did that bore and stroke it would be even more interesting with a solid roller at about 6800,Smitty
articfriends is offline  
Old 04-28-2007, 07:58 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
PatriYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waterford,MI
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

800 hp can be done from 532 ci no problem. But how much will it cost? Custom ported heads with valvetrain to spin 7000 rpm, sheet metal tunnel rams, dual Dominators. Right there you've got 12-15,000.00. And think of the maintanence. I'd build a tall deck 4.6 bore x 4.5 stroke with Afr 357 cnc heads, Super Victor intake and a moderate solid roller to get 800 hp and put to rest of my money into a better drive. If you're going racing even a high rpm, low torque engine is going to break drives.
PatriYacht is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
85Baja
General Q & A
15
08-25-2008 10:31 PM
Quent
General Boating Discussion
13
08-21-2007 08:14 AM
two-air
General Q & A
7
05-06-2007 11:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: Big strokes break drives ??????


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.