Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
2.30" intake valve/piston clearance >

2.30" intake valve/piston clearance

Notices

2.30" intake valve/piston clearance

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-29-2008, 01:37 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Grog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 2.30" intake valve/piston clearance

All -

I am installing a set of HP500 heads with 2.30" intake valves on a stock Gen VI 502. The old heads had 2.19" intake valves. I am running a stock cam and plan on using .040" head gaskets (Fel Pro 17048, I think)

Would you expect any valve to piston clearance issues???
Grog is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 01:39 PM
  #2  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Grog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh, and while I am here, does anybody have a copy of Dennis Moore's Marine BBC book that they want to sell.....rent.....lend?
Grog is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 08:28 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
jdnca1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Grog
All -

I am installing a set of HP500 heads with 2.30" intake valves on a stock Gen VI 502. The old heads had 2.19" intake valves. I am running a stock cam and plan on using .040" head gaskets (Fel Pro 17048, I think)

Would you expect any valve to piston clearance issues???
You should have more than enough...but its still worth checking.
jdnca1 is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 11:08 PM
  #4  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,555
Received 1,816 Likes on 904 Posts
Default

You won't have any issues. Pretty sure the engines use the same pistons. The cam you ar eusing is much smaller as well.
Griff is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 09:39 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MT. JULIET, TN.
Posts: 3,710
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Greg, I was pretty sure you would be okay. You sure you don't want to change the cam? I've got two "731 Cranes " on the shelf!
kennyo is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 09:47 AM
  #6  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Grog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

Originally Posted by kennyo
Greg, I was pretty sure you would be okay. You sure you don't want to change the cam? I've got two "731 Cranes " on the shelf!
Stop that. Stop that right now!
Grog is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 04:03 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Those heads will work best with 2.250 int. dia. with the correct port work. If your already committed to the 2.300 you will still have to do pocket porting to benefit from the larger valve.
mrhorsepower1 is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 09:50 PM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Grog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mrhorsepower1
Those heads will work best with 2.250 int. dia. with the correct port work. If your already committed to the 2.300 you will still have to do pocket porting to benefit from the larger valve.
I appreciate everyone's input. I realize that I may not be optimized, but right now, my goal is to just get back on the water.......this spring.........without spending more money.

Kennyo - If you still have those 731s next fall, I may be interested in one.

Griff - Why would the cam matter? At TDC of the stroke the lifter should not be on the ramp of the camshaft, and the intake valve should be completely closed...right?

Still looking for, and counting votes. Will I have a problem when I bolt things back together and turn the key?

Thanks again.
Grog is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 03:31 AM
  #9  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,555
Received 1,816 Likes on 904 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Grog
Griff - Why would the cam matter? At TDC of the stroke the lifter should not be on the ramp of the camshaft, and the intake valve should be completely closed...right?



Thanks again.
Correct, but valve to piston clearance problems really don't happen at TDC, they happen when the cam and piston are moving. A bigger cam will open the valves farther during this process and they will get closer together as they move up and down. The distance also changes if you advance or retard the cam timing.
Griff is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 01:01 PM
  #10  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Grog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Griff
Correct, but valve to piston clearance problems really don't happen at TDC, they happen when the cam and piston are moving. A bigger cam will open the valves farther during this process and they will get closer together as they move up and down. The distance also changes if you advance or retard the cam timing.
Understood. I would guess then that clearances would get even tighter at max rpm when/if the valves start to float and when the pistons see their greatest travel in the bore.
Grog is offline  


Quick Reply: 2.30" intake valve/piston clearance


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.