Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
2 motors vs three >

2 motors vs three

Notices

2 motors vs three

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-19-2008, 12:05 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
bcfountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: prince george,va
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2 motors vs three

anybody got any idea about the fuel comsumption of three motors vs two?will the three motor boat use more gas all the time,vers a two motor boat with the same h/p rateings.a guy was trying to tell me that a 42-47 fountain will get better fuel comsumption w/three 502's vs the same boat w/twin 600's or 700's.any input?
bcfountain is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 03:53 PM
  #2  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,558
Received 1,821 Likes on 907 Posts
Default

Its possible. My 32 AT with twin 502mpi's get better mileage at cruise speeds than my single hopped up 525SC 28 Pantera did.
Griff is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 04:08 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Leonard, MI
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A hull design will take X amount of horesepower to power the boat forward at a given speed. Ideally that horsepower is devided between how many engines you have. But there is the increase amount of drag in the water from an additional drive an weight increase. Potentially 3 engines could deliver the needed horsepower lower in there RPM range at a point where they are more fuel efficient than the same boat with twins.
scarab31 is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 05:09 PM
  #4  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Hydrocruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow

I like the idea of a 47'er having three 525's strictly for reliability sake if for no other.
Hydrocruiser is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 03:35 AM
  #5  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 121
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If the 3rd engine can allow you to cruise under 3500 you will have a fuel saving
powerabout is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:06 AM
  #6  
Registered
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Fuel consumption is relative to how much horsepower you're making. There are conditions where you would use less TOTAL horsepower with the triples and get better fuel efficiency.

I love triple engine boats. I had a 40' Hustler w/3 502 Mag 415s.

There are other advantages to trips:

You can lose one engine and still get home on plane at a good speed. (I blew away Stu Jones when I ran most of a Poker Run on two engines)!

Instant planing. Never have that bow up situation that limits visibility until planing speed is met.

Boat flies level with the center engine so far forward.

The down-side is buying oil, filters, spark plugs and belts for three engines rather than two. Still worth it.
Edward R. Cozzi is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:38 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The downside is less efficiency. Running the output through two drivelines vs. 3 is an advantage. Plus the drag loss of the 3'rd drive and prop slip all have to be factored in. Plus, there's the fact that you're carrying around an additional 1,000 lbs (and that's conservative- allowing for additional hardware on the twins, like blowers.)

There are plusses & minuses- and mostly it's dependent on the individual boat. I think that a larger boat would be more forgiving of triples vs. a smaller one.
Chris Sunkin is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:57 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
bcfountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: prince george,va
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3vs2

so are you guys telling me you can use either 2 motors or three when running.i was under the impression that you have to use 3 motors all the time??
bcfountain is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 01:59 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If you want to run on just two, you're going to have to jump in and yank the prop on that center drive.
Chris Sunkin is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 04:01 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
kr1276's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You don't have to yank the center prop. Sure you could pull the prop to reduce drag but it is not necessary.

I have trip 496's and my boat it will plane on any combination of the two. I blew a drive on the port side halfway between Key West and Sanibel. I was actually on my way back to Tampa and continued on, but Sanibel was a fuel stop on the way back. I ran the port engine at idle and left it in neutral so the hydraulic steering worked properly. It is a little harder to get on plane but not a big issue and can still cruise about 40-45 on two. I have had trips for four years and find more positives than negatives to having them.

I remember my 38 with twins and when one went down, you better hope and pray you are not 40 miles from your destination as you are not going to get on plane.

I agree that maintenance costs are higher but since I do most of the maintenance myself, it is negligible.

I would definitely go trips on my next boat.
kr1276 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2 motors vs three


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.