Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Whipple or Raylar: Problem Free or Not? >

Whipple or Raylar: Problem Free or Not?

Notices
View Poll Results: Have you had any problems or not with either Whipple or Raylar
Whipple: No problems
14
63.64%
Whipple: Problems!
0
0%
Raylar: No problems
8
36.36%
Raylar: Problems!
0
0%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Whipple or Raylar: Problem Free or Not?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-17-2010, 10:50 AM
  #11  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific, MO
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the contact number Mitch!
NoWake200 is offline  
Old 06-07-2010, 10:23 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm pretty sure Kevin broke his engine with the Whipple on a stock bottom right???
SDFever is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:22 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: www.bajaboatowners.com
Posts: 2,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

One thing your over looking in this upgrade is plan on buying a drive. With either application even a XR drive won't last long with the torque a Whipple makes. Let alone the X drve your boat has. My .02
Irishtornado is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:44 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irishtornado
One thing your over looking in this upgrade is plan on buying a drive. With either application even a XR drive won't last long with the torque a Whipple makes. Let alone the X drve your boat has. My .02
I have an XR now. I ran the regular X with the Raylar 600 for a long, long, hard time. It got abused and then I changed some habits.

Drives breaking are more related to an operator rather than power but that's my 02
SDFever is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:58 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: www.bajaboatowners.com
Posts: 2,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Another thing you need to investigate if you go with the Raylar heads they increase the compression and I believe it's too much compression to run a Whipple setup on.
Irishtornado is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 09:22 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Wink

Raising compression on any engine with cylinder head changes is somewhat predicated on how the new head handles combustion temperatures and the burn in the head of the various fuel types it will run. We have built Raylar cylinder head equipped Whipple supercharged engine with fantastic results and no problems as well as many of our customers have done the same with no problems.

The simple answer is also that good heads help breathing, better breathing makes more power,supercharged or normally asspirated as long as the boost is adjusted on a supercharged engine for the drop that better breathing delivers.
Obviously with the supercharging premium 91 octane or better fuel is required but the added compression of our great aluminum cylinder head if kept in the 8.0 to 9.5 compression ratio is very workable. Putting our heads on a stock Merc 496 and supercharging it in our opionion is an absolute NO NO!

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.