Horsepower Loss do to Wet Exghaust
I am interested in any hard test data on engine horsepower from an engine tested with wet exhaust and then tested without wet exhaust.
|
ttt
|
Originally Posted by DareDevil
(Post 3123160)
maybe 1-2 HP ,,u will not feel it on a stock or mild engine !!!!!
The huge HP engines can't run wey because of reversion problems... The dry ones are just LOUD and BAD A$$ sounding..lol:party-smiley-004: |
Im searching for some data Ive seen.....
a good set of long tube headers is typically good for 25HP or more in an NA situation. Its going to depend on a lot on the build, and exhaust manifold/header itself as well as the wet dry part. High overlap long duration cams wil respond better to dry and be affected more. The further downstream you mix- the less loss usually the realize. Im looking, and should have bookmarked the data I looked at. Uncle Dave |
Originally Posted by Uncle Dave
(Post 3123180)
Im searching for some data Ive seen.....
a good set of long tube headers is typically good for 25HP or more in an NA situation. Its going to depend on a lot on the build, and exhaust manifold/header itself as well as the wet dry part. High overlap long duration cams wil respond better to dry and be affected more. The further downstream you mix- the less loss usually the realize. Im looking, and should have bookmarked the data I looked at. Uncle Dave I just need some hard/real numbers and the configuration/hp they came from. I'm talking ball park. Thanks |
I brought it up so the poster would know there are differences between the two.
Some guys arent aware of the drastic differences in pricing or effectiveness. UD |
I am running Dana Torque Flow exhaust manifolds with #5 risers on a heavily modified 496 . These manifilds test within a couple of hp to the CMI sport tube headers with wet exhaust.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.