B 1 drivr to a XR
#4
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My XR went right on in place of the Bravo I with no bearing change or anything else. The input shaft on the XR is same size as the reg Bravo and the gimble bearing is the standard $50 part (Red Dot).
#5
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toms River, New Jersey
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boat is an 03. All 3 of my current drives range from 99 - 07. From very early OM to OW.
I loaned one of my drives to a neighbor who owned a 98 runabout. Again, the OW drive went right on the 98 transom assembly.
I may stand corrected but I don't think the size of the input shaft ever changed on the Bravo. The size of it changed on the "inside" of the case but not on the end that goes in the coupler.
On alpha's, it changed from 98 and up.
I loaned one of my drives to a neighbor who owned a 98 runabout. Again, the OW drive went right on the 98 transom assembly.
I may stand corrected but I don't think the size of the input shaft ever changed on the Bravo. The size of it changed on the "inside" of the case but not on the end that goes in the coupler.
On alpha's, it changed from 98 and up.
#7
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And if you really think about it...
Companies like Merc often times avoid redesigning every part so that selling upgraded parts becomes easier.
Of course, there are many exceptions to that but they knew a lot of reg Bravo owners would eventually like to upgrade to the XR once they broke something (like me).
Companies like Merc often times avoid redesigning every part so that selling upgraded parts becomes easier.
Of course, there are many exceptions to that but they knew a lot of reg Bravo owners would eventually like to upgrade to the XR once they broke something (like me).
#8
Registered
iTrader: (1)
The size of the input shaft has not changed.
The only reason you need the RED dot gimble or the new greaseless (dot is there no color in it) bearing is because the U-joints are bigger.
You also need the plastic U shapped part that go into the trim rams that limit the travel in the up position. I think they are 1/2 inch.
If you need any part numbers let me know, I have the service Bulletin at home from switching from Bravo to an X drive.
I bet you have the red dot if you pull the drive.
The only reason you need the RED dot gimble or the new greaseless (dot is there no color in it) bearing is because the U-joints are bigger.
You also need the plastic U shapped part that go into the trim rams that limit the travel in the up position. I think they are 1/2 inch.
If you need any part numbers let me know, I have the service Bulletin at home from switching from Bravo to an X drive.
I bet you have the red dot if you pull the drive.
#9
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toms River, New Jersey
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rod dot
The size of the input shaft has not changed.
The only reason you need the RED dot gimble or the new greaseless (dot is there no color in it) bearing is because the U-joints are bigger.
You also need the plastic U shapped part that go into the trim rams that limit the travel in the up position. I think they are 1/2 inch.
If you need any part numbers let me know, I have the service Bulletin at home from switching from Bravo to an X drive.
I bet you have the red dot if you pull the drive.
The only reason you need the RED dot gimble or the new greaseless (dot is there no color in it) bearing is because the U-joints are bigger.
You also need the plastic U shapped part that go into the trim rams that limit the travel in the up position. I think they are 1/2 inch.
If you need any part numbers let me know, I have the service Bulletin at home from switching from Bravo to an X drive.
I bet you have the red dot if you pull the drive.