Whipple or Procharge
#24
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
Personally I lean towards the Procharger because thats what I own and run, as far as a bunch of un-needed torque down low, can't see the need for it, I am already making 900 ft lbs at 3500 and 780 ft lbs at 3000 with a procharger that everyone claims doesn't make any low end or mid range. As far as looks and customer support, Whipple would win every time but I could give two ****ts about bling. I'm running stainless marine 3's with 5 inch tails too, they have no bling factor either but they don't crack and they last about forever, Smitty
#25
Registered
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We have used both, will never use Pro Chargers again even if they gave them away, Whipple's all the way, except for changing synthetic fluid in charger we ran four years running, not one problem.
#30
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally I lean towards the Procharger because thats what I own and run, as far as a bunch of un-needed torque down low, can't see the need for it, I am already making 900 ft lbs at 3500 and 780 ft lbs at 3000 with a procharger that everyone claims doesn't make any low end or mid range. As far as looks and customer support, Whipple would win every time but I could give two ****ts about bling. I'm running stainless marine 3's with 5 inch tails too, they have no bling factor either but they don't crack and they last about forever, Smitty
Short pull on a 540 with M3